Ethics, Info, Tech: Contested Voices, Values, Spaces

My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" was published on Nov. 13, 2025. Purchases can be made via Amazon and this Bloomsbury webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/

Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2026

AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency; The Washington Post, May 17, 2026

Annie Gowen, The Washington Post; AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

"The cameras at the heart of the debate are run by Flock Safety, a technology company that has built a network of automatic license plate readers in more than 6,000 communities across the country in recent years. 

Flock’s system uses AI-enabled cameras to snap photos of every vehicle that passes, creating a digital “fingerprint” that includes data as personal as bumper stickers or gun racks.

Flock cameras are beloved by police because officers can use the company’s national database to track vehicle movements to recover drugs and stolen automobiles, and to solve even more serious crimes. A company spokesman said in a statement that the devices support “communities across the country in addressing crime and locating missing people.”...

Yet the company’s rapid expansion has given rise to citizen concerns about intrusive surveillance, worries that have intensified amid reports that federal immigration enforcement officials used the system to target immigrants."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:22 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI license plate cameras, automatic license plate readers, data collection and use, Flock cameras, Flock Safety, ICE, immigrants, privacy, safety, surveillance, Troy NY

Monday, May 11, 2026

Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is worker control and surveillance; The Guardian, May 11, 2026

Nazrul Islam , The Guardian; Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is worker control and surveillance

"The real danger that artificial intelligence poses to work is not just job loss – it is the growing divide between people who use AI to extend their skills and those whose working lives are increasingly shaped by opaque, AI-powered systems of surveillance and control.

The debate about artificial intelligence and how it will affect workers is stuck in the wrong place. On one side are warnings that machines are coming for millions of jobs. On the other are claims that AI will turbocharge productivity. Both stories miss what is already happening in workplaces across the world, from Britain to Kenya to the United States.

For some, AI can help remove the drudgery from daily work. These are often people in better-paid, higher-autonomy roles: analysts, consultants, lawyers, academics, managers. In these jobs, provided AI is being rolled out to augment workers rather than replace them, it can feel like a copilot. It can support human judgment, speed up routine tasks and create space for more creative thinking.

For many others, though, AI is not an assistant. It is a boss.

It appears in scheduling and monitoring tools, route optimisation software and automated performance dashboards – all systems that decide who gets what shift, how long a task should take and whether someone is performing at their maximum capacity. In these workplaces, AI is not something you use. It is something that watches and rules you.

That is the new divide we should all be paying attention to."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:43 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI assistants, AI bossware tech, AI watching workers, AI workplace divides, drudgery mitigated by AI, privacy, productivity, surveillance, workers controlled by AI, workers overseen by AI

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears; The Guardian, April 21, 2026

Aisha Down and Robert Booth, The Guardian ; Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears

Alarm caused by posts of Alex Karp, tech firm’s CEO, championing US military dominance and of AI weapons

"The US spy tech company Palantir published a manifesto extolling the benefits of American power and implying some cultures are inferior to others – in what MPs have called “a parody of a RoboCop film” and “the ramblings of a supervillain”.

“Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive,” wrote Palantir in a 22-point post on X over the weekend, which also called for an end to the “postwar neutering” of Germany and Japan...

The pronouncement is the most recent of a number of high-profile statements from Palantir and its chief executive, Alex Karp, which appear to indicate that Karp views himself as not simply the head of a software company, but a pundit with important insights into the future of civilisation."...

In an interview with CNBC in early March, Karp suggested that AI would “disrupt” the power of “highly educated, often female voters who vote mostly Democrat”,and instead empower “vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters”."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 12:34 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Alex Karp, Big Tech, data collection and use, Palantir, privacy, spy tech, surveillance, UK

Sunday, March 15, 2026

SHELLEY’S ‘FRANKENSTEIN’ GETS AN AI REBOOT AT PASADENA’S HASTINGS BRANCH LIBRARY; Pasadena Now, March 15, 2026

Pasadena Now; SHELLEY’S ‘FRANKENSTEIN’ GETS AN AI REBOOT AT PASADENA’S HASTINGS BRANCH LIBRARY

A discussion today ties the 1818 novel's warnings about creator responsibility to contemporary debates over artificial intelligence, part of the city's One City, One Story program 

"Two centuries before algorithms began analyzing people’s dreams and predicting their crimes, Mary Shelley wrote a novel about a scientist who built something he could not control. That novel, “Frankenstein,” is the subject of a free discussion today at Hastings Branch Library, where presenter Rosemary Choate will connect its 207-year-old themes to the same questions about artificial intelligence that Pasadena’s citywide reading program is exploring all month.

The event, titled “Frankenstein: Myths and the Real Story?” is part of the Pasadena Public Library’s 24th annual One City, One Story program, which this year selected Laila Lalami’s “The Dream Hotel” — a dystopian novel about a woman detained because an algorithm, fed by data from her dreams, deemed her a future criminal. The library has organized a month of lectures, films and book discussions around the novel’s themes of surveillance, technology and freedom, and the Frankenstein session draws a direct line between Shelley’s 1818 tale and the anxieties at the center of Lalami’s story.

Choate, a comparative literature and humanities instructor and founder of the Pomona College Alumni Book Club, will lead the discussion at 3 p.m. She will examine themes including creator responsibility, the consequences of unchecked technological ambition and society’s rejection of the “creation” — questions the library’s event description calls “highly relevant to contemporary debates surrounding the development and governance of AI,” according to the Pasadena Public Library’s event listing.

Shelley published “Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus” anonymously in 1818, when she was 20 years old. The novel tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who assembles a creature from dead body parts and recoils from what he has made. The creature, abandoned by its creator, becomes violent as it fails to find acceptance. The novel is widely considered one of the first works of science fiction.

The One City, One Story program, now in its 24th year, selects a single book each year for citywide reading and discussion. A 19-member committee of community volunteers, led by Senior Librarian Christine Reeder, chose “The Dream Hotel” for its exploration of surveillance, freedom and the reach of technology into private life. The program is sponsored by The Friends of the Pasadena Public Library and the Pasadena Literary Alliance.

The month of events culminates in a conversation with Lalami and Pasadena Public Library Director Tim McDonald on Saturday, March 21, at 2 p.m. at Pasadena Presbyterian Church, 585 E. Colorado Blvd. That event is also free and open to the public."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 7:22 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: “The Dream Hotel” book, access to information, AI, AI algorithms, book discussion programs, creator responsibilities, Frankenstein, freedom, Laila Lalami, libraries, Pasadena CA, reading, surveillance, tech anxieties

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

OpenAI robotics leader resigns over concerns about Pentagon AI deal; NPR, March 8, 2026

Willem Marx , NPR; OpenAI robotics leader resigns over concerns about Pentagon AI deal

"A senior member of OpenAI's robotics team has resigned, citing concerns about how the company moved forward with a recently announced partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense.

Caitlin Kalinowski, who served as a member of technical staff focused on robotics and hardware, posted on social media that she had stepped down on "principle" after the company revealed plans to make its AI systems available inside secure Defense Department computing systems...

In public posts explaining her decision, Kalinowski wrote: "I resigned from OpenAI. I care deeply about the Robotics team and the work we built together. This wasn't an easy call."

She said policy guardrails around certain AI uses were not sufficiently defined before OpenAI announced an agreement with the Pentagon. "AI has an important role in national security," Kalinowski wrote. "But surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got.""

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:42 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI ethics, AI guardrails, AI oversight, AI policy, AI policy guardrails, Anthropic, Caitlin Kalinowski, lethal autonomy, national security, OpenAI, OpenAI robotics team, Pentagon AI contracts, privacy, robotics, surveillance

Sunday, March 8, 2026

Anthropic’s Ethical Stand Could Be Paying Off; The Atlantic, March 7, 2026

 Ken Harbaugh, The Atlantic; Anthropic’s Ethical Stand Could Be Paying Off

"The events of the past week reminded me of my early days as a Navy pilot nearly three decades ago. One of my first tasks was to sign a document pledging never to surveil American citizens. By the time of the 9/11 attacks, I was an aircraft commander, leading combat-reconnaissance aircrews that gathered large-scale intelligence and informed battlefield targeting decisions. I took for granted that somewhere along those decision chains, a human being was in the loop.

I could not have defined artificial intelligence then, but I understood instinctively that a person, not a machine, would bear the weight of life-and-death choices. This was not a bureaucratic consideration. It was a hard line that those of us in uniform were expected to hold.

In the standoff between Anthropic and the Pentagon, a private company was forced to hold the line against its own government. In doing so, Anthropic may have earned something more valuable than the contract it lost. In an industry where trust is the scarcest resource, Anthropic just banked a substantial deposit."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 2:17 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Anthropic, Dario Amodei, DoD, OpenAI, Pete Hegseth, privacy, Sam Altman, surveillance, trust

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon over AI use. Here’s what each side wants; CNBC, February 18, 2026

 Ashley Capoot, CNBC; Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon over AI use. Here’s what each side wants

"Anthropic wants assurance that its models will not be used for autonomous weapons or to “spy on Americans en masse,” according to a report from Axios. 

The DOD, by contrast, wants to use Anthropic’s models “for all lawful use cases” without limitation."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 11:35 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Anthropic, autonomous weapons, Claude, defense contractors, DoD, mass surveillance, national security, security, spying, surveillance, Trump 2.0

Palantir is caught in the middle of a brewing fight between Anthropic and the Pentagon; Fast Company, February 17, 2026

REBECCA HEILWEIL, Fast Company; Palantir is caught in the middle of a brewing fight between Anthropic and the Pentagon

"A dispute between AI company Anthropic and the Pentagon over how the military can use the company’s technology has now gone public. Amid tense negotiations, Anthropic has reportedly called for limits on two key applications: mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. The Department of Defense, which Trump renamed the Department of War last year, wants the freedom to use the technology without those restrictions.

Caught in the middle is Palantir. The defense contractor provides the secure cloud infrastructure that allows the military to use Anthropic’s Claude model, but it has stayed quiet as tensions escalate. That’s even as the Pentagon, per Axios, threatens to designate Anthropic a “supply chain risk,” a move that could force Palantir to cut ties with one of its most important AI partners."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 11:26 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Anthropic, autonomous weapons, Claude, defense contractors, DoD, mass surveillance, Palantir, surveillance, Trump 2.0

Saturday, February 14, 2026

Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts; The New York Times, February 13, 2026

 Sheera Frenkel and Mike Isaac , The New York Times; Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts

The department has sent Google, Meta and other companies hundreds of subpoenas for information on accounts that track or comment on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, officials and tech workers said.

"The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticize the agency.

In recent months, Google, Reddit, Discord and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, have received hundreds of administrative subpoenas from the Department of Homeland Security, according to four government officials and tech employees privy to the requests. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Google, Meta and Reddit complied with some of the requests, the government officials said. In the subpoenas, the department asked the companies for identifying details of accounts that do not have a real person’s name attached and that have criticized ICE or pointed to the locations of ICE agents. The New York Times saw two subpoenas that were sent to Meta over the last six months.

The tech companies, which can choose whether or not to provide the information, have said they review government requests before complying. Some of the companies notified the people whom the government had requested data on and gave them 10 to 14 days to fight the subpoena in court."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 10:24 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: accountability, anti-ICE social media accounts, Big Tech companies, criticism of DHS, cybertracking, DHS, due process, free speech, privacy, right of dissent, rule of law, social media, subpoenas, surveillance

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Professors Are Being Watched: ‘We’ve Never Seen This Much Surveillance’; The New York Times, February 4, 2026

Vimal Patel , The New York Times; Professors Are Being Watched: ‘We’ve Never Seen This Much Surveillance’

Scrutiny of university classrooms is being formalized, with new laws requiring professors to post syllabuses and tip lines for students to complain.

"College professors once taught free from political interference, with mostly their students and colleagues privy to their lectures and book assignments. Now, they are being watched by state officials, senior administrators and students themselves."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 4:35 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: academic freedom, censorship, chilling effects, faculty, Florida, free speech, higher education, Oklahoma, political interference, searchable databases for syllabi, students, surveillance, Texas, tip lines for complaints

Friday, January 30, 2026

ICE’s surveillance app is a techno-authoritarian nightmare; The Guardian, January 30, 2026

Moustafa Bayoumi, The Guardian; ICE’s surveillance app is a techno-authoritarian nightmare

"Now is the time we must start paying attention to another highly damaging part of ICE’s arsenal: the agency’s deployment of mass surveillance.

I’m referring specifically to Mobile Fortify, a specialized app ICE has been using at least since May 2025. (Usage of the app was first reported last June by 404Media.) What is Mobile Fortify? It’s an app for facial recognition that can additionally take “contactless fingerprints” of someone simply by snapping a picture of a person’s fingers. The app has been used more than 100,000 times, including on children, as alleged in a lawsuit filed by the State of Illinois and the City of Chicago. And it’s dangerous."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:58 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: bias, biometric data, CBP, children's privacy, DHS, East Germany, facial recognition technology, ICE surveillance, Mobile Fortify, privacy, surveillance, surveillance apps, Trump 2.0

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

How ICE is using facial recognition in Minnesota; The Guardian, January 27, 2026

Sanya Mansoor, The Guardian; How ICE is using facial recognition in Minnesota

"Immigration enforcement agents across the US are increasingly relying on a new smartphone app with facial recognition technology.

The app is named Mobile Fortify. Simply pointing a phone’s camera at their intended target and scanning the person’s face allows Mobile Fortify to pull data on an individual from multiple federal and state databases, some of which federal courts have deemed too inaccurate for arrest warrants.

The US Department of Homeland Security has used Mobile Fortify to scan faces and fingerprints in the field more than 100,000 times, according to a lawsuit brought by Illinois and Chicago against the federal agency, earlier this month. That’s a drastic shift from immigration enforcement’s earlier use of facial recognition technology, which was otherwise limited largely to investigations and ports of entry and exit, legal experts say."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 1:46 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: arrest warrants, biometric data, DHS, facial recognition apps, facial recognition technology, ICE, Minnesota, Mobile Fortify, privacy, surveillance

Friday, December 12, 2025

Immigration Agents Are Using Air Passenger Data for Deportation Effort; The New York Times, December 12, 2025

Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times; Immigration Agents Are Using Air Passenger Data for Deportation Effort

"The Trump administration is providing the names of all air travelers to immigration officials, substantially expanding its use of data sharing to expel people under deportation orders.

Under the previously undisclosed program, the Transportation Security Administration provides a list multiple times a week to Immigration and Customs Enforcement of travelers who will be coming through airports. ICE can then match the list against its own database of people subject to deportation and send agents to the airport to detain those people.

It’s unclear how many arrests have been made as a result of the collaboration."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:32 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: air passenger data, airport travelers, arrests of travelers, data collection and use, deportations, detainees, DHS, ICE, ICE DHS TSA collaborations, immigrants, immigration agents, privacy, surveillance, TSA

Thursday, November 20, 2025

Trump Hatches Creepy New Plot to Target ‘Suspicious’ Drivers; The Daily Beast, November 20, 2025

Tom Latchem  , The Daily Beast; Trump Hatches Creepy New Plot to Target ‘Suspicious’ Drivers

"Border Patrol agents armed with hidden cameras and AI-driven algorithms are flagging millions of American drivers as “suspicious” and triggering covert traffic stops across the country, according to a new investigation.

The Trump administration has quietly expanded a vast domestic surveillance web that tracks and analyzes the travel patterns of millions of drivers—feeding local police tips that lead to secretive traffic stops, searches, and arrests, the Associated Press reports.

The intelligence project, built and run by Border Patrol’s parent agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) gathers vehicle movements through a national network of covert license plate readers disguised inside roadside barrels, cones, and job-site equipment, AP reports...

Legal scholars warn that the scale of the data collection—tracking “patterns of life” for millions of ordinary drivers—could violate the Fourth Amendment. “Large-scale surveillance technology that’s capturing everyone and everywhere at every time” may be unconstitutional, Andrew Ferguson, a law professor at George Washington University, told AP.

The program is powered by an enormous expansion of CBP’s intelligence capabilities since President Donald Trump returned to office. Congress has authorized more than $2.7 billion to layer artificial intelligence onto existing surveillance networks. 

Meanwhile, Operation Stonegarden—a two-decade-old federal grant scheme—now channels hundreds of millions of dollars to local sheriff’s offices to buy license-plate readers and drones, and to fund overtime that effectively deputizes local cops into Border Patrol’s mission. Under Trump, congressional Republicans increased Stonegarden to $450 million over four fiscal years."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 2:26 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 4th Amendment, AI, AI algorithms, CBP, covert traffic stops, data collection and use, DHS, domestic surveillance, Operation Stonegarden, privacy, surveillance, Trump 2.0, US drivers, vehicle movements

Friday, November 7, 2025

The ethics of AI, from policing to healthcare; KPBS; November 3, 2025

 Jade Hindmon / KPBS Midday Edition Host,  Ashley Rusch / Producer, KPBS; The ethics of AI, from policing to healthcare

"Artificial intelligence is everywhere — from our office buildings, to schools and government agencies.

The Chula Vista Police Department is joining cities to use AI to write police reports. Several San Diego County police departments also use AI-powered drones to support their work. 

Civil liberties advocates are concerned about privacy, safety and surveillance. 

On Midday Edition, we sit down with an expert in AI ethics to discuss the philosophical questions of responsible AI.

Guest:

  • David Danks, professor of data science, philosophy and policy at UC San Diego"
Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 1:16 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI uses by law enforcement, Chula Vista Police Department, civil liberties, data biases, David Danks, healthcare, policing, privacy, public agencies, responsible AI, surveillance

Friday, October 31, 2025

New Book by José Marichal, California Lutheran University; You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract

New Book by José Marichal, California Lutheran University; You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract

Description:

"In the age of AI, where personal data fuels corporate profits and state surveillance, what are the implications for democracy?

This incisive book explores the unspoken agreement we have with tech companies. In exchange for reducing the anxiety of an increasingly complex online world, we submit to algorithmic classification and predictability. This reduces incentives for us to become “algorithmic problems” with dire consequences for liberal democracy. He calls for a movement to demand that algorithms promote play, creativity and potentiality rather than conformity.

This is a must-read for anyone navigating the intersection of technology, politics and identity in an increasingly data-driven world."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:06 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: "algorithmic problems", AI, algorithmic classification and predictability, algorithms, classification, democracy, José Marichal, liberal democracy, personal data, political science, surveillance, tech companies

Thursday, October 16, 2025

How to Secure Your Phone for the No Kings Protest; Your Time Starts Now (Substack), October 15, 2025

LORI CORBET MANN, Your Time Starts Now (Substack); How to Secure Your Phone for the No Kings Protest

"This post is about using technology safely at a protest — how to protect yourself, and the people you organise with, from unnecessary risk.

It’s a longer read than I would have liked — I’ve learned that when I just post the steps, I’m flooded with questions asking why, so I’ve explained the reasoning too. But if you prefer to skip straight to the practical advice, you’ll find a downloadable checklist at the end.

Technology is everywhere: phones, tablets, headphones, smartwatches, fitness trackers. In everyday life that’s fine, but at a protest it can expose you and others to tracking and surveillance.

This guide explains how those devices broadcast information, how that data can be used to identify or locate you, and what you can do to reduce those risks. The aim isn’t to frighten you — it’s to help you make calm, informed choices about what you carry and how you use it."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 11:51 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to information, burner phones, considerations when attending rallies, cybertracking, data collection and use, No Kings Day rallies, securing smartphones, smartphones, surveillance, Trump 2.0

Saturday, October 4, 2025

How to live a good life in difficult times: Yuval Noah Harari, Rory Stewart and Maria Ressa in conversation; The Guardian, October 4, 2025

Interview by Alex Clark , The Guardian; How to live a good life in difficult times: Yuval Noah Harari, Rory Stewart and Maria Ressa in conversation


[Kip Currier: One of the most insightful, nuanced, enlightening pieces I've read amongst thousands this year. I've followed and admired the work and wisdom of Maria Ressa and Yuval Noah Harari but wasn't familiar with UK academic and politician Rory Stewart who makes interesting contributions to this joint interview. They all individually and collectively identify in clear-eyed fashion what's going on in the world today, what the stakes are, and what each of us can do to try to make some kind of positive difference.

I shared this article with others in my network and encourage you to do the same, so these beneficial, thought-provoking perspectives can be read by as many as possible.]


[Excerpt]

"What happens when an internationally bestselling historian, a Nobel peace prize-winning journalist and a former politician get together to discuss the state of the world, and where we’re heading? Yuval Noah Harari is an Israeli medieval and military historian best known for his panoramic surveys of human history, including Sapiens, Homo Deus and, most recently, Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI. Maria Ressa, joint winner of the Nobel peace prize, is a Filipino and American journalist who co-founded the news website Rappler. And Rory Stewart is a British academic and former Conservative MP, writer and co-host of The Rest Is Politics podcast. Their conversation ranged over the rise of AI, the crisis in democracy and the prospect of a Trump-Putin wedding, but began by considering a question central to all of their work: how to live a good life in an increasingly fragmented and fragile world?...

YNH I think that more people need to realise that we have to do the hard work ourselves. There is a tendency to assume that we can rely on reality to do the job for us. That if there are people who talk nonsense, who support illogical policies, who ignore the facts, sooner or later, reality will wreak vengeance on them. And this is not the way that history works.

So if you want the truth, and you want reality to win, each of us has to do some of the hard work ourselves: choose one thing and focus on that and hope that other people will also do their share. That way we avoid the extremes of despair."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 7:01 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, avoiding despair, Big Tech, ethics, journalism, Maria Ressa, need to do hard work ourselves to make positive changes, Rory Stewart, shamelessness, surveillance, Trump 2.0, truth, Yuval Noah Harari

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Documents offer rare insight on Ice’s close relationship with Palantir; The Guardian, September 22, 2025

 Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian; Documents offer rare insight on Ice’s close relationship with Palantir

"Over the past decade, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice) has amassed millions of data points that it uses to identify and track its targets – from social media posts to location history and, most recently, tax information.

And there’s been one, multibillion-dollar tech company particularly instrumental in enabling Ice to put all that data to work: Palantir, the data analytics firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, the rightwing mega-donor and tech investor.

For years, little was known about how Ice uses Palantir’s technology. The company has consistently described itself as a “data processor” and says it does not play an active role in any of its customers’ data collection efforts or what clients do with that information.

Now, a cache of internal Ice documents – including hundreds of pages of emails between Ice and Palantir, as well as training manuals, and reports on the use of Palantir products – offer some of the first real-world examples of how Ice has used Palantir in its investigations and during on-the-ground enforcement operations.

The documents, which were obtained by immigrant legal rights group Just Futures Law through a Freedom of Information Act request and reviewed by the Guardian, largely cover Palantir’s contract with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of Ice that is responsible for stopping the “illegal movement of people, goods, money, contraband, weapons and sensitive technology”."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:14 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to information, AI tech companies, cybertracking, data collection and use, FOIA, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), ICE, Just Futures Law, Palantir, Peter Thiel, PII, privacy, security, sensitive data, surveillance

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

License plate camera company halts cooperation with federal agencies; Associated Press via ABC News, August 25, 2025

JOHN O'CONNOR Associated Press; License plate camera company halts cooperation with federal agencies

"One of the nation's leading operators of automated license-plate reading systems announced Monday it has paused its operations with federal agencies because of confusion and concern — including in Illinois — about the purpose of their investigations.

Flock Safety, whose cameras are mounted in more than 4,000 communities nationwide, put a hold last week on pilot programs with the Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border Protection and its law enforcement arm, Homeland Security Investigations, according to a statement by its founder and CEO, Garrett Langley. 

Among officials in other jurisdictions, Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias raised concerns. He announced Monday that an audit found Customs and Border Protection had accessed Illinois data, although he didn't say that the agency was seeking immigration-related information. A 2023 law the Democrat pushed bars sharing license plate data with police investigating out-of-state abortions or undocumented immigrants."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:46 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Alexi Giannoulias, automated license-plate reading systems, data collection and use, DHS, Flock Safety, Illinois, Illinois data, out-of-state abortions, privacy, surveillance, undocumented immigrants
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information.Education: PhD, University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences (2007); Juris Doctor (JD), University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS), University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences. Member of American Bar Association (ABA), ABA IP Law Section, ABA Science & Technology Section; Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T); Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE)
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (833)
    • ▼  May (145)
      • CBS walks back copyright claims on Stephen Colbert...
      • Delivery robots are spreading across LA. Residents...
      • Babel or Jerusalem? Pope Leo weighs AI and the hum...
      • Platner ad contained copyrighted material, Sox cab...
      • Carlow, Duquesne leaders to meet Pope Leo during C...
      • Pope Leo Compares AI Threat to Biblical ‘Tower of ...
      • Pope Leo Warns of Risks From A.I. in 42,300-Word E...
      • Pope Leo will take on AI alongside an Anthropic co...
      • Disney’s Copyright Suit Against Chinese AI Develop...
      • Florida biologist fired over Charlie Kirk post win...
      • Ousted library director wins $475,000 settlement i...
      • You can’t control everything’: the rise in plastic...
      • Artist Sues Copyright Office Over its Refusal to R...
      • Budget cuts mean some Missouri kids won’t get free...
      • Trump posts AI video depicting him throwing Colber...
      • I went to Anthropic's ethics gathering. I left bel...
      • It’s a Copyright Lawsuit, Charlie Brown; The New Y...
      • Court Rules Against Anna’s Archive in Copyright La...
      • A year after Trump fired a top ethics watchdog, th...
      • STEPHEN COLBERT USES COPYRIGHTED ‘PEANUTS’ MUSIC D...
      • Soundtrack to 8,000 Job Cuts: A Meta Worker’s Layo...
      • Pa. can move ahead with broadband expansion after ...
      • Deepfakes are testing the limits of IP law; Politi...
      • White House must comply with Presidential Records ...
      • Class Of 2026 Faces A Hard Truth: AI Isn’t The Thr...
      • Literary Prizewinners Are Facing AI Allegations. I...
      • There Has Never Been an Example of Presidential Co...
      • Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades for undergr...
      • Elon Musk and the US government fought an AI anti-...
      • A 16th-Century Sketch Claims to Depict Anne Boleyn...
      • Book on Truth in the Age of A.I. Contains Quotes M...
      • Why College Grads Are Booing Their Commencement Sp...
      • The Tech Workers Building A.I. Are Scared of It, T...
      • The Villain of This Year’s Commencement Speeches: ...
      • TEACHING AT PITT: AI v. AI — A case from the prose...
      • How ‘learnrights’ would compensate creators for AI...
      • AI won’t replace lawyers. It will create more of t...
      • Lawmakers push for AI data center moratoriums as m...
      • AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and ...
      • Law Schools Implement AI to Focus on Ethics and Te...
      • What A.I. Did to My College Class; The New York Ti...
      • Building intellectual property awareness across di...
      • Should AI designs be eligible for Iowa State Fair'...
      • Why U.S. Test Scores Are in a ‘Generation-Long Dec...
      • How a kindergarten teacher became the accidental g...
      • The Smithsonian’s most contested exhibition is bac...
      • On the “Superior Ethical Criterion” for Assessing ...
      • Who Owns AI-Generated Content? Human Authorship St...
      • What Are Your Company’s AI Nightmares?; Harvard Bu...
      • Anthropic’s $1.5B copyright settlement is getting ...
      • Movers & Shakers 2026; Library Journal, May 4, 2026
      • A Seat at the Table: Reflections from eight ALA tr...
      • Authors, publishers near final approval of $1.5 bi...
      • Alex Haley’s “Roots” to be removed from Knox Count...
      • Why We Keep Tricking Ourselves Into Thinking A.I. ...
      • Committee publishes Government response to AI and ...
      • Pope decries rise of AI-directed warfare, saying i...
      • What really won the trillion-dollar Supreme Court ...
      • Neal Katyal draws criticism over TED Talk revealin...
      • Anthropic and the Gates Foundation are teaming up ...
      • Transportation Secretary Duffy filmed a reality sh...
      • Senators Defend Copyright Office Independence as A...
      • Public Knowledge Opposes Blatant Move To Steal Cop...
      • U.S. Set to Drop Charges Against Indian Billionair...
      • Duffy’s ‘Great American Road Trip’ Prompts Ethical...
      • Trump’s plan to use his library as a hotel sparks ...
      • Maker of Canvas Learning Platform Strikes Deal for...
      • 'AI has no soul': Pope Leo expected to address AI'...
      • UCF commencement speaker met with boos over pro-AI...
      • The AI Backlash Could Get Very Ugly; The Atlantic,...
      • Most U.S. doctors are quietly using this AI tool. ...
      • Canada Targets AI Copyright Rules While Weighing S...
      • I Forgave My Mother, but It Was Too Late; The New ...
      • Celebrities are filing trademarks to combat AI clo...
      • Mayor Mamdani restores library funding after publi...
      • At the AAP’s Annual Meeting, Talk of AI, Copyright...
      • How AI Killed a 133-Year-Old Princeton Tradition; ...
      • Authors Guild Issues Updated AI Best Practices for...
      • What palm readers and chatbots have in common; The...
      • I’m a Doctor. Here’s What A.I. Cannot Do.; The New...
      • Molière Ex Machina: AI used to create ‘new work’ b...
      • Google Says Criminal Hackers Used A.I. to Find a M...
      • This Bookstore Gets Good Mileage; The New York Tim...
      • They Were Promised New Septic Tanks. Trump Called ...
      • Shein accuses Temu of copyright infringement on 'i...
      • Sean Duffy Slammed Over Road Trip Reality Show Fil...
      • Dua Lipa sues Samsung for $15 million for allegedl...
      • Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is ...
      • Sony’s failed war against Internet piracy may doom...
      • A.I. Populism Is Here. And No One Is Ready.; The N...
      • Top law schools for intellectual property law; the...
      • Is Your Bot Becoming Your Balm?; Psychology Today,...
      • Tech is turning increasingly to religion in a ques...
      • Banned Nonfiction Books Double in Public Schools, ...
      • Hantavirus misinformation runs rampant as the US i...
      • Court Revives Copyright Lawsuit Over Annie Leibovi...
      • A Michigan farm town voted down plans for a giant ...
      • ABC Accuses Government of Violating First Amendmen...
      • Prosecutor suspended by state supreme court for ar...
      • Meta’s AI Copyright Fight Just Escalated and Holly...
    • ►  April (212)
    • ►  March (123)
    • ►  February (165)
    • ►  January (188)
  • ►  2025 (1602)
    • ►  December (219)
    • ►  November (180)
    • ►  October (119)
    • ►  September (95)
    • ►  August (138)
    • ►  July (150)
    • ►  June (224)
    • ►  May (114)
    • ►  April (95)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (108)
    • ►  January (80)
  • ►  2024 (878)
    • ►  December (81)
    • ►  November (96)
    • ►  October (223)
    • ►  September (85)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (87)
    • ►  June (81)
    • ►  May (39)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (29)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2023 (510)
    • ►  December (45)
    • ►  November (39)
    • ►  October (91)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (63)
    • ►  July (84)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2022 (312)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (61)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (53)
  • ►  2021 (145)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2020 (222)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (60)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2019 (335)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (81)
  • ►  2018 (611)
    • ►  December (68)
    • ►  November (77)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (43)
    • ►  August (60)
    • ►  July (47)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (80)
    • ►  March (68)
    • ►  February (57)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2017 (561)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (81)
    • ►  June (100)
    • ►  May (91)
    • ►  April (52)
    • ►  March (64)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (71)
  • ►  2016 (1106)
    • ►  December (65)
    • ►  November (117)
    • ►  October (57)
    • ►  September (54)
    • ►  August (182)
    • ►  July (163)
    • ►  June (115)
    • ►  May (65)
    • ►  April (83)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (77)
    • ►  January (48)
  • ►  2015 (258)
    • ►  December (53)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2014 (115)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ►  2013 (105)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2012 (104)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (152)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (56)
  • ►  2010 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (9)

Followers

Simple theme. Theme images by hdoddema. Powered by Blogger.