Ethics, Info, Tech: Contested Voices, Values, Spaces

My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" was published on Nov. 13, 2025. Purchases can be made via Amazon and this Bloomsbury webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/

Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2026

AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency; The Washington Post, May 17, 2026

Annie Gowen, The Washington Post; AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

"The cameras at the heart of the debate are run by Flock Safety, a technology company that has built a network of automatic license plate readers in more than 6,000 communities across the country in recent years. 

Flock’s system uses AI-enabled cameras to snap photos of every vehicle that passes, creating a digital “fingerprint” that includes data as personal as bumper stickers or gun racks.

Flock cameras are beloved by police because officers can use the company’s national database to track vehicle movements to recover drugs and stolen automobiles, and to solve even more serious crimes. A company spokesman said in a statement that the devices support “communities across the country in addressing crime and locating missing people.”...

Yet the company’s rapid expansion has given rise to citizen concerns about intrusive surveillance, worries that have intensified amid reports that federal immigration enforcement officials used the system to target immigrants."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:22 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI license plate cameras, automatic license plate readers, data collection and use, Flock cameras, Flock Safety, ICE, immigrants, privacy, safety, surveillance, Troy NY

Monday, May 11, 2026

Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is worker control and surveillance; The Guardian, May 11, 2026

Nazrul Islam , The Guardian; Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is worker control and surveillance

"The real danger that artificial intelligence poses to work is not just job loss – it is the growing divide between people who use AI to extend their skills and those whose working lives are increasingly shaped by opaque, AI-powered systems of surveillance and control.

The debate about artificial intelligence and how it will affect workers is stuck in the wrong place. On one side are warnings that machines are coming for millions of jobs. On the other are claims that AI will turbocharge productivity. Both stories miss what is already happening in workplaces across the world, from Britain to Kenya to the United States.

For some, AI can help remove the drudgery from daily work. These are often people in better-paid, higher-autonomy roles: analysts, consultants, lawyers, academics, managers. In these jobs, provided AI is being rolled out to augment workers rather than replace them, it can feel like a copilot. It can support human judgment, speed up routine tasks and create space for more creative thinking.

For many others, though, AI is not an assistant. It is a boss.

It appears in scheduling and monitoring tools, route optimisation software and automated performance dashboards – all systems that decide who gets what shift, how long a task should take and whether someone is performing at their maximum capacity. In these workplaces, AI is not something you use. It is something that watches and rules you.

That is the new divide we should all be paying attention to."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:43 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI assistants, AI bossware tech, AI watching workers, AI workplace divides, drudgery mitigated by AI, privacy, productivity, surveillance, workers controlled by AI, workers overseen by AI

Friday, May 1, 2026

Maryland Is First to Ban A.I.-Driven Price Increases in Grocery Stores; The New York Times, May 1, 2026

John S.W. MacDonald, The New York Times; Maryland Is First to Ban A.I.-Driven Price Increases in Grocery Stores

"Maryland this week became the first state in America to ban grocery stores and third-party delivery services like DoorDash from using customers’ personal data to set higher prices.

The practice — supported by artificial intelligence and known as dynamic pricing or surveillance pricing — can lead to two consumers paying different amounts for the same item from the same retailer, at roughly the same time. If a store knows, for example, that one of those customers lives in a wealthier neighborhood, it can charge that person a higher price.

The bill enforcing the ban, the Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, goes into effect on Oct. 1. Merchants face fines of $10,000 for running afoul of the law, and penalties of $25,000 for repeat offenses.

“At a time when technology can predict what we need, when we need it, when we’ll pay for it and also when we’ll pay more for it,” Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland, a Democrat, said at a signing ceremony for the bill on Tuesday. “And at a time when we are watching how big companies are then using those analytics against us to make record profits, Maryland is not just pushing back. Maryland is pushing forward.”"

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:57 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI-driven dynamic pricing, data analytics, data collection and use, dynamic pricing, Maryland, privacy, Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, surveillance pricing, Wes Moore

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Authors Guild Addresses Publishers’ AI Use; Publishers Weekly, April 21, 2026

Sam Spratford , Publishers Weekly; Authors Guild Addresses Publishers’ AI Use

"The Authors Guild has released a statement criticizing publishing professionals’ use of AI tools following a report first published in the Bookseller that some editors have been uploading authors’ personal information, including manuscripts, into consumer-facing LLMs like ChatGPT.

“Uploading or inputting a copyrighted work or an author’s personal information into AI systems without permission may constitute a violation of the author’s copyright or right of privacy, and it puts the author’s intellectual property and personal information at risk,” the statement read. “Editors, agents, and others in the industry who have access to authors’ works should not upload any manuscript to or otherwise prompt consumer-facing chatbots with any author’s works without first getting the author’s written permission.”"

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:14 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI tools, AI training data, author IP rights, Authors Guild, copyright law, permission, PII, privacy, publishers, publishers' AI use, uploading author manuscripts, uploading of authors' personal information

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears; The Guardian, April 21, 2026

Aisha Down and Robert Booth, The Guardian ; Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears

Alarm caused by posts of Alex Karp, tech firm’s CEO, championing US military dominance and of AI weapons

"The US spy tech company Palantir published a manifesto extolling the benefits of American power and implying some cultures are inferior to others – in what MPs have called “a parody of a RoboCop film” and “the ramblings of a supervillain”.

“Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive,” wrote Palantir in a 22-point post on X over the weekend, which also called for an end to the “postwar neutering” of Germany and Japan...

The pronouncement is the most recent of a number of high-profile statements from Palantir and its chief executive, Alex Karp, which appear to indicate that Karp views himself as not simply the head of a software company, but a pundit with important insights into the future of civilisation."...

In an interview with CNBC in early March, Karp suggested that AI would “disrupt” the power of “highly educated, often female voters who vote mostly Democrat”,and instead empower “vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters”."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 12:34 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Alex Karp, Big Tech, data collection and use, Palantir, privacy, spy tech, surveillance, UK

Monday, April 20, 2026

Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers; TechCrunch, April 15, 2026

Rebecca Bellan, TechCrunch ; Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers

"After helping lead the lawsuit that bankrupted media firm Gawker, Aron D’Souza says he saw something broken in the American media system: People who felt harmed by coverage had little recourse to fight back.

His solution is software. D’Souza says his latest startup, Objection, aims to use AI to adjudicate the truth of journalism. And for the price of $2,000, anyone can pay to challenge a story, triggering a public investigation into its claims. (D’Souza is also the founder of the Enhanced Games, an Olympics-style competition that allows performance-enhancing drugs and is set to debut in Las Vegas next month.)

Objection launched on Wednesday with “multiple millions” in seed funding from Peter Thiel and Balaji Srinivasan, as well as VC firms Social Impact Capital and Off Piste Capital. 

Thiel, who funded the Gawker lawsuit partly in defense of the individual right to privacy, has long been critical of the media. D’Souza says his goal is to restore trust in the Fourth Estate, which he argues has collapsed over decades. Critics, including media lawyers, warn Objection could make it harder to publish the kind of reporting that holds powerful institutions to account, particularly if that reporting relies on confidential sources."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:39 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: accountability, AI ratings of journalism, anonymous sources, Aron D’Souza, freedom of press, Gawker, investigative journalism, journalists, Objection startup, Peter Thiel, privacy, truth, VC firms, whistleblowers

Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos As New Update Goes Live; Forbes, April 20, 2026

Zak Doffman, Forbes; Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos As New Update Goes Live

"Take a moment to think before you dive in. That’s the best advice for Google Photos users, as the company confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

We’re talking Personal Intelligence, Google’s latest AI upgrade path which lets users opt-in to connecting Google apps to Gemini...

This is the latest iteration in the ongoing battle between convenience and privacy playing out on our phones and computers."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:30 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI image generators, AI tools, computers, connecting Google apps to Gemini, convenience, convenience v. privacy, Gemini, Google, Google's Personal Intelligence, photos, privacy, smartphones

Maryland passes legislation banning retailers from using personal data to set prices. Does it do enough?; WAMU, April 17, 2026

Esther Ciammichilli, Jackson Sinnenberg, WAMU; Maryland passes legislation banning retailers from using personal data to set prices. Does it do enough?

"The Maryland General Assembly passed a bill this week will prohibit food retailers from changing the price of their products – in real time – depending on who is buying them. The practice is called dynamic pricing. 

The new legislation is expected to be signed into law by Governor Wes Moore, who introduced it with leaders in the General Assembly. It will specifically prohibit retailers from using personal protected data to set prices for individual customers. This kind of data includes biometric information like ethnicity, sex, and gender identity...

What made Governor Wes Moore and the assembly leadership want to tackle dynamic pricing during this session?

Well, I think we’ve seen over the last several years this sort of catch up that we’re doing. Technology is moving so fast and the tech companies are finding more and more ways to exploit, really, the data, the algorithms, what they know about us in ways that are really harmful to consumers.

Over the last few years we’ve had several bills that are about protecting biodynamics, protecting consumer privacy, protecting the use of data without people’s permission. I think over the last year we saw a new way that these tech companies and these large corporations are finding ways to combine data brokers, private personal data, in a way that’s really harmful to consumers, in a way that really exploits consumers. And so this year, this is what we tackled.

During the final debate over the bill last week, you said, “One of the largest corporations in the world is announcing to their shareholders technology which they will patent to be able to adjust prices based on personal data.” Can you elaborate on the details of that announcement?

Yeah, so, you know, Walmart is …  they’re not going to have paper tags on their grocery stores anymore on there for for their prices. They’re gonna have these little screens that can change immediately. Digital screens to price your milk and your eggs and flour and and whatever else.

But what this technology allows them to do ultimately is to figure out who’s standing in front of that screen and change the price based on who you are. And that’s really the thing that we’re trying to get ahead of with this legislation."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:15 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI algorithms, bias, biometric data, consumer exploitation, consumer privacy, data collection and use, dynamic pricing, food retailers, Maryland, patents, PII, privacy, sensitive data, using personal data to set prices, Walmart

Sunday, April 5, 2026

What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots; The New York Times, April 4, 2026

Kashmir Hill

Photographs by Frances F. Denny

, The New York Times ; What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots

"There are a growing number of companies offering social chatbots that can act like friends, enemies, lovers, adventurous companions, or the manifestation of a fictional or real person you’ve always wanted to meet. You can pick A.I. Elon Musk’s brain or spar with A.I. Draco Malfoy. The myriad characters, often created by fellow users, offer drama, romance, therapy and LOLs.

Apps that feature role-playing chatbots are used by tens of millions of people, with engagement times that rival or surpass those of social media behemoths such as TikTok, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. The majority of teens surveyed by Pew use A.I. chatbots, with one out of 11 saying they had used Character.AI.

“If you think your child is not talking to chatbot companions, you’re probably wrong,” said Mitch Prinstein, co-director of the Winston Center on Technology and Brain Development at U.N.C. Chapel Hill.

Chatbots are surging in popularity as society is still grappling with how social media has affected young people; a wave of lawsuits is moving through the courts seeking damages from companies that plaintiffs say have deliberately created addictive products. (A jury in California recently found that Meta and YouTube were liable for $6 million in damages to one young woman.) And now parents and caregivers have a new attention-absorbing technology to reckon with.

At the beginning of last year, a high school teacher in Chicago told me that some of her students were dating chatbots, and she worried that they were having their first erotic experiences with them. I wanted to find out what teens had to say about that, so I joined communities devoted to social chatbot apps on the online messaging forum Discord. I introduced myself as a reporter and “an old,” and explained that I was interested in talking to young people who used the services regularly."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 5:03 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: addiction, addictive product design, AI Chatbots, AI companions, attention-absorbing tech, children, data collection and use, privacy, product liability, role-playing chatbots, social chatbots, social media, teens

Saturday, April 4, 2026

Napa Valley Schools Emphasize Honesty, Ethics in AI Policy; GovTech, April 2, 2026

 Atmika Iyer, The Modesto Bee, Calif. via GovTech; Napa Valley Schools Emphasize Honesty, Ethics in AI Policy

"10 principles for AI use in Napa schools


1. Teaching and learning: AI should be used to personalize and enhance the learning experience for each student and to support digital citizenship and literacy.

2. Staff usage: AI should be used as a tool to augment and support, rather than replace, staff in the performance of their duties and responsibilities.

3. Ethical use and transparency: AI should be used ethically and transparently by all staff and students, with careful consideration of potential biases, and in compliance with all applicable intellectual property and copyright laws.

4. Accountability and responsibility: AI should be used in a manner that ensures accountability by those who use it and that those who use it are responsible for such use, including when and how it is used.

5. Academic honesty: The district should allow artificial intelligence tools to be used only in ways that support learning — such as research, skill development, or teacher-approved assistance — and prohibit any use that replaces a student’s original thinking or results in cheating, plagiarism or other acts of academic dishonesty.

6. Equity and access: AI should be implemented in a manner that ensures equitable access and opportunity for all students, regardless of background or ability, and for all schools across the district.

7. Secure and private: The district should prioritize security and privacy when changing existing practices or adopting new practices regarding AI.

8. Professional development: The district should provide ongoing professional development for staff, with a particular focus on the ethical and responsible use of AI.

9. Community engagement: The district should engage with the community to share these principles, to educate the community on AI, and to discuss the permitted and prohibited uses of AI in the district.

10. Continuous improvement: The district should regularly evaluate the use of AI by students and staff, and adapt its policies, procedures and professional development to align with best practices and evolving technologies. The district reserves the right to remove access to previously approved AI platforms.

(Source: Napa Valley Unified School District’s Board Policy Manual)

In a bid to develop a set of guidelines for responsible use of technology, the district convened an AI council of 30 stakeholders including parents, teachers, students and staff in May 2025. The council met five times to review CSBA’s policy and make a recommendation to the board.

In addition, the council developed guidelines for AI use for all stakeholders. These will be shared in the 2026-2027 school year. Amid rapid technological developments, the district plans to update them regularly."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 7:09 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access, accountability, AI ethics, AI policy, California School Board Assn, community engagement, equity, ethics, honesty, Napa Valley Schools, permitted and prohibited uses of AI, privacy, security, students, transparency

Thursday, April 2, 2026

NHS staff boycott Palantir’s data platform over ethical concerns; Financial Times, April 1, 2026

Laura Hughes , Financial Times; NHS staff boycott Palantir’s data platform over ethical concerns

Controversial US tech group was awarded a £330mn contract in 2023 to collate hospital and patient information

"A growing number of NHS staff are refusing to work on Palantir’s health data platform over ethical concerns about the controversial US tech company.

The technology company was awarded a £330mn contract in 2023 to create the Federated Data Platform (FDP), which collates NHS operational data such as waiting lists, staffing, patient information and operating theatre schedules.

Palantir’s NHS role has become increasingly contentious owing to its work in the US defence sector and co-founder and chief executive Alex Karp’s outspoken backing for Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown." 
Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 11:52 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Alex Karp, ethical concerns, health data, National Health Service (NHS), Palantir, privacy, UK

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

I broke up with my Kindle. My new e-reader treats me better.; The Washington Post, March 31, 2026

Michael J. Coren, The Washington Post; I broke up with my Kindle. My new e-reader treats me better.

After Amazon’s Kindle removed my ability to download and back up my own e-books, I went in search of an alternative.


"As corporate walled gardens have replaced the freewheeling, open internet of the 1990s and 2000s, we’ve ceded control over almost everything about our online experience. Nearly every keystroke, swipe and tap is now monitored, recorded and analyzed for potential profit.


The Kindle ecosystem is perhaps the apotheosis of this shift. One Guardian reporter found Amazon had recorded every title, highlight and page turn on her Kindle app (40,000 entries over two years). The company’s dominance sets the terms for everyone in the marketplace.


Including me. Like tens of millions of others, I have owned a Kindle (a Paperwhite). Last year, it started to feel as if it owned me. The final straw was when Kindle removed my ability to download and back up my own e-books. So I went in search of an alternative.


I bought a Kobo.


Was it the bibliophile Eden some Kobo fans described? Not quite. The reality was messier than I expected. It turns out we can’t escape Big Brother on our e-readers just yet. But a more open society is coming into view for book lovers — and perhaps all of us.


Here’s how to turn the page."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 1:25 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 1st sale doctrine, access, access to information, Amazon, copyright law, data collection and use, ebooks, ereaders, Kindle, Kobo, licensing, no digital 1st Sale Doctrine, privacy

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

OpenAI robotics leader resigns over concerns about Pentagon AI deal; NPR, March 8, 2026

Willem Marx , NPR; OpenAI robotics leader resigns over concerns about Pentagon AI deal

"A senior member of OpenAI's robotics team has resigned, citing concerns about how the company moved forward with a recently announced partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense.

Caitlin Kalinowski, who served as a member of technical staff focused on robotics and hardware, posted on social media that she had stepped down on "principle" after the company revealed plans to make its AI systems available inside secure Defense Department computing systems...

In public posts explaining her decision, Kalinowski wrote: "I resigned from OpenAI. I care deeply about the Robotics team and the work we built together. This wasn't an easy call."

She said policy guardrails around certain AI uses were not sufficiently defined before OpenAI announced an agreement with the Pentagon. "AI has an important role in national security," Kalinowski wrote. "But surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got.""

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:42 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI ethics, AI guardrails, AI oversight, AI policy, AI policy guardrails, Anthropic, Caitlin Kalinowski, lethal autonomy, national security, OpenAI, OpenAI robotics team, Pentagon AI contracts, privacy, robotics, surveillance

Sunday, March 8, 2026

Anthropic’s Ethical Stand Could Be Paying Off; The Atlantic, March 7, 2026

 Ken Harbaugh, The Atlantic; Anthropic’s Ethical Stand Could Be Paying Off

"The events of the past week reminded me of my early days as a Navy pilot nearly three decades ago. One of my first tasks was to sign a document pledging never to surveil American citizens. By the time of the 9/11 attacks, I was an aircraft commander, leading combat-reconnaissance aircrews that gathered large-scale intelligence and informed battlefield targeting decisions. I took for granted that somewhere along those decision chains, a human being was in the loop.

I could not have defined artificial intelligence then, but I understood instinctively that a person, not a machine, would bear the weight of life-and-death choices. This was not a bureaucratic consideration. It was a hard line that those of us in uniform were expected to hold.

In the standoff between Anthropic and the Pentagon, a private company was forced to hold the line against its own government. In doing so, Anthropic may have earned something more valuable than the contract it lost. In an industry where trust is the scarcest resource, Anthropic just banked a substantial deposit."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 2:17 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Anthropic, Dario Amodei, DoD, OpenAI, Pete Hegseth, privacy, Sam Altman, surveillance, trust

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Elite Doctors Served Jeffrey Epstein While Treating His ‘Girls’; The New York Times, February 28, 2026

David A. Fahrenthold, Azeen Ghorayshi and Maggie Astor , The New York Times; Elite Doctors Served Jeffrey Epstein While Treating His ‘Girls’

A small stable of doctors gave V.I.P. medical services to the sex offender and the women around him. Some doctors bent or broke the ethical rules of their profession.

"It’s unsurprising that someone with Mr. Epstein’s wealth and elite connections would receive white-glove service from concierge doctors and V.I.P. treatment at major hospitals. But the new documents reveal how some of his doctors bent or broke the ethical rules of their profession."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:52 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to sensitive information, confidentiality, doctors, Epstein files, Jeffrey Epstein, medical ethics, PII, privacy

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Dinner Is Being Recorded, Whether You Know It or Not; The New York Times, February 16, 2026

 Luke Fortney , The New York Times; Dinner Is Being Recorded, Whether You Know It or Not

"To be in public is to risk being filmed. And these days, there’s a good chance it’s happening surreptitiously with smart glasses. Their wearers are filming in restaurants, cafes and bars, capturing warped, eye-level video of drive-through pranks, Michelin-starred meals and work shifts at Texas Roadhouse. Servers, owners and customers can end up as captive participants...

Filming in public spaces is broadly protected by the First Amendment. Some states, including California and Pennsylvania, have two-party consent laws that prohibit recording without express permission, but enforcing them hinges on whether someone has a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in a given setting, said Aaron Krowne, a New York City lawyer specializing in privacy and civil liberties. Restaurants fall in a legal gray area: They are privately owned, but open to anyone who walks in...

The responsibility of using these devices ethically falls largely on the wearer."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:56 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: "reasonable expectation of privacy", being recorded surreptitiously, civil liberties, ethics, filming in public spaces, IP, privacy, rights of publicity, smart glasses, smart glasses' users, two-party consent laws

Saturday, February 14, 2026

Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts; The New York Times, February 13, 2026

 Sheera Frenkel and Mike Isaac , The New York Times; Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts

The department has sent Google, Meta and other companies hundreds of subpoenas for information on accounts that track or comment on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, officials and tech workers said.

"The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticize the agency.

In recent months, Google, Reddit, Discord and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, have received hundreds of administrative subpoenas from the Department of Homeland Security, according to four government officials and tech employees privy to the requests. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Google, Meta and Reddit complied with some of the requests, the government officials said. In the subpoenas, the department asked the companies for identifying details of accounts that do not have a real person’s name attached and that have criticized ICE or pointed to the locations of ICE agents. The New York Times saw two subpoenas that were sent to Meta over the last six months.

The tech companies, which can choose whether or not to provide the information, have said they review government requests before complying. Some of the companies notified the people whom the government had requested data on and gave them 10 to 14 days to fight the subpoena in court."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 10:24 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: accountability, anti-ICE social media accounts, Big Tech companies, criticism of DHS, cybertracking, DHS, due process, free speech, privacy, right of dissent, rule of law, social media, subpoenas, surveillance

Thursday, February 12, 2026

House members seek inquiry into DoJ’s tracking of their Epstein files research; The Guardian, February 12, 2026

Joseph Gedeon, The Guardian; House members seek inquiry into DoJ’s tracking of their Epstein files research

"Members of Congress are calling for investigations after discovering the Department of Justice created records of their research activities while they dug into files connected to Jeffrey Epstein.

Photographs taken by Reuters during a congressional hearing on Wednesday showed the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, holding a document titled “Jayapal Pramila Search History”, listing files that the Democratic US representative Pramila Jayapal had accessed during her review of the Epstein materials...

The department of justice confirmed to the Guardian that it does, in fact, monitor all Epstein file searches from lawmakers on its systems."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:26 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: cybertracking, DOJ tracking Epstein files research by Congressmembers, Epstein file searches, Epstein files, Pam Bondi, privacy, search histories

Saturday, February 7, 2026

Moltbook was peak AI theater; MIT Technology Review, February 6, 2026

 Will Douglas Heaven, MIT Technology Review; Moltbook was peak AI theater

"Perhaps the best way to think of Moltbook is as a new kind of entertainment: a place where people wind up their bots and set them loose. “It’s basically a spectator sport, like fantasy football, but for language models,” says Jason Schloetzer at the Georgetown Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy. “You configure your agent and watch it compete for viral moments, and brag when your agent posts something clever or funny.”

“People aren’t really believing their agents are conscious,” he adds. “It’s just a new form of competitive or creative play, like how Pokémon trainers don’t think their Pokémon are real but still get invested in battles.”

Even if Moltbook is just the internet’s newest playground, there’s still a serious takeaway here. This week showed how many risks people are happy to take for their AI lulz. Many security experts have warned that Moltbook is dangerous: Agents that may have access to their users’ private data, including bank details or passwords, are running amok on a website filled with unvetted content, including potentially malicious instructions for what to do with that data."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:28 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI agents, AI bots, AI hype, AI LLMs, AI lulz, AI theater, creative play, Moltbook, Moltbook as AI spectator sport, Moltbook as type of entertainment, PII, privacy, private data, security

Thursday, February 5, 2026

Failure to Alert Judge to Press Law for Reporter Search Draws Ethical Scrutiny; The New York Times, February 5, 2026

Charlie Savage , The New York Times; Failure to Alert Judge to Press Law for Reporter Search Draws Ethical Scrutiny

"The disclosure that the Justice Department failed to alert a judge about a 1980 law protecting journalists when applying for a warrant to search a Washington Post reporter’s home last month is casting new scrutiny on the legal issues raised by the raid.

Specialists in legal ethics said that if the prosecutor who submitted the application, Gordon D. Kromberg, an assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, knew about the 1980 law, the failure to bring it up violated a longstanding legal ethics rule.

The Justice Department and Mr. Kromberg did not respond to requests for comment. Nor did lawyers for The Post and its reporter.

Here is a closer look."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:50 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: DOJ, failure to disclose, Gordon D. Kromberg, Hannah Natanson, legal ethics, legal ethics rules, privacy, Privacy Protection Act of 1980, search of Washington Post reporter's home
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information.Education: PhD, University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences (2007); Juris Doctor (JD), University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS), University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences. Member of American Bar Association (ABA), ABA IP Law Section, ABA Science & Technology Section; Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T); Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE)
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (836)
    • ▼  May (148)
      • Brockovich AI Data Center Reporting
      • Erin Brockovich Asks Americans for Help as She Lau...
      • Lawyers for January 6 defendants must face jury ex...
      • CBS walks back copyright claims on Stephen Colbert...
      • Delivery robots are spreading across LA. Residents...
      • Babel or Jerusalem? Pope Leo weighs AI and the hum...
      • Platner ad contained copyrighted material, Sox cab...
      • Carlow, Duquesne leaders to meet Pope Leo during C...
      • Pope Leo Compares AI Threat to Biblical ‘Tower of ...
      • Pope Leo Warns of Risks From A.I. in 42,300-Word E...
      • Pope Leo will take on AI alongside an Anthropic co...
      • Disney’s Copyright Suit Against Chinese AI Develop...
      • Florida biologist fired over Charlie Kirk post win...
      • Ousted library director wins $475,000 settlement i...
      • You can’t control everything’: the rise in plastic...
      • Artist Sues Copyright Office Over its Refusal to R...
      • Budget cuts mean some Missouri kids won’t get free...
      • Trump posts AI video depicting him throwing Colber...
      • I went to Anthropic's ethics gathering. I left bel...
      • It’s a Copyright Lawsuit, Charlie Brown; The New Y...
      • Court Rules Against Anna’s Archive in Copyright La...
      • A year after Trump fired a top ethics watchdog, th...
      • STEPHEN COLBERT USES COPYRIGHTED ‘PEANUTS’ MUSIC D...
      • Soundtrack to 8,000 Job Cuts: A Meta Worker’s Layo...
      • Pa. can move ahead with broadband expansion after ...
      • Deepfakes are testing the limits of IP law; Politi...
      • White House must comply with Presidential Records ...
      • Class Of 2026 Faces A Hard Truth: AI Isn’t The Thr...
      • Literary Prizewinners Are Facing AI Allegations. I...
      • There Has Never Been an Example of Presidential Co...
      • Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades for undergr...
      • Elon Musk and the US government fought an AI anti-...
      • A 16th-Century Sketch Claims to Depict Anne Boleyn...
      • Book on Truth in the Age of A.I. Contains Quotes M...
      • Why College Grads Are Booing Their Commencement Sp...
      • The Tech Workers Building A.I. Are Scared of It, T...
      • The Villain of This Year’s Commencement Speeches: ...
      • TEACHING AT PITT: AI v. AI — A case from the prose...
      • How ‘learnrights’ would compensate creators for AI...
      • AI won’t replace lawyers. It will create more of t...
      • Lawmakers push for AI data center moratoriums as m...
      • AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and ...
      • Law Schools Implement AI to Focus on Ethics and Te...
      • What A.I. Did to My College Class; The New York Ti...
      • Building intellectual property awareness across di...
      • Should AI designs be eligible for Iowa State Fair'...
      • Why U.S. Test Scores Are in a ‘Generation-Long Dec...
      • How a kindergarten teacher became the accidental g...
      • The Smithsonian’s most contested exhibition is bac...
      • On the “Superior Ethical Criterion” for Assessing ...
      • Who Owns AI-Generated Content? Human Authorship St...
      • What Are Your Company’s AI Nightmares?; Harvard Bu...
      • Anthropic’s $1.5B copyright settlement is getting ...
      • Movers & Shakers 2026; Library Journal, May 4, 2026
      • A Seat at the Table: Reflections from eight ALA tr...
      • Authors, publishers near final approval of $1.5 bi...
      • Alex Haley’s “Roots” to be removed from Knox Count...
      • Why We Keep Tricking Ourselves Into Thinking A.I. ...
      • Committee publishes Government response to AI and ...
      • Pope decries rise of AI-directed warfare, saying i...
      • What really won the trillion-dollar Supreme Court ...
      • Neal Katyal draws criticism over TED Talk revealin...
      • Anthropic and the Gates Foundation are teaming up ...
      • Transportation Secretary Duffy filmed a reality sh...
      • Senators Defend Copyright Office Independence as A...
      • Public Knowledge Opposes Blatant Move To Steal Cop...
      • U.S. Set to Drop Charges Against Indian Billionair...
      • Duffy’s ‘Great American Road Trip’ Prompts Ethical...
      • Trump’s plan to use his library as a hotel sparks ...
      • Maker of Canvas Learning Platform Strikes Deal for...
      • 'AI has no soul': Pope Leo expected to address AI'...
      • UCF commencement speaker met with boos over pro-AI...
      • The AI Backlash Could Get Very Ugly; The Atlantic,...
      • Most U.S. doctors are quietly using this AI tool. ...
      • Canada Targets AI Copyright Rules While Weighing S...
      • I Forgave My Mother, but It Was Too Late; The New ...
      • Celebrities are filing trademarks to combat AI clo...
      • Mayor Mamdani restores library funding after publi...
      • At the AAP’s Annual Meeting, Talk of AI, Copyright...
      • How AI Killed a 133-Year-Old Princeton Tradition; ...
      • Authors Guild Issues Updated AI Best Practices for...
      • What palm readers and chatbots have in common; The...
      • I’m a Doctor. Here’s What A.I. Cannot Do.; The New...
      • Molière Ex Machina: AI used to create ‘new work’ b...
      • Google Says Criminal Hackers Used A.I. to Find a M...
      • This Bookstore Gets Good Mileage; The New York Tim...
      • They Were Promised New Septic Tanks. Trump Called ...
      • Shein accuses Temu of copyright infringement on 'i...
      • Sean Duffy Slammed Over Road Trip Reality Show Fil...
      • Dua Lipa sues Samsung for $15 million for allegedl...
      • Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is ...
      • Sony’s failed war against Internet piracy may doom...
      • A.I. Populism Is Here. And No One Is Ready.; The N...
      • Top law schools for intellectual property law; the...
      • Is Your Bot Becoming Your Balm?; Psychology Today,...
      • Tech is turning increasingly to religion in a ques...
      • Banned Nonfiction Books Double in Public Schools, ...
      • Hantavirus misinformation runs rampant as the US i...
      • Court Revives Copyright Lawsuit Over Annie Leibovi...
      • A Michigan farm town voted down plans for a giant ...
    • ►  April (212)
    • ►  March (123)
    • ►  February (165)
    • ►  January (188)
  • ►  2025 (1602)
    • ►  December (219)
    • ►  November (180)
    • ►  October (119)
    • ►  September (95)
    • ►  August (138)
    • ►  July (150)
    • ►  June (224)
    • ►  May (114)
    • ►  April (95)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (108)
    • ►  January (80)
  • ►  2024 (878)
    • ►  December (81)
    • ►  November (96)
    • ►  October (223)
    • ►  September (85)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (87)
    • ►  June (81)
    • ►  May (39)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (29)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2023 (510)
    • ►  December (45)
    • ►  November (39)
    • ►  October (91)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (63)
    • ►  July (84)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2022 (312)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (61)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (53)
  • ►  2021 (145)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2020 (222)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (60)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2019 (335)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (81)
  • ►  2018 (611)
    • ►  December (68)
    • ►  November (77)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (43)
    • ►  August (60)
    • ►  July (47)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (80)
    • ►  March (68)
    • ►  February (57)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2017 (561)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (81)
    • ►  June (100)
    • ►  May (91)
    • ►  April (52)
    • ►  March (64)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (71)
  • ►  2016 (1106)
    • ►  December (65)
    • ►  November (117)
    • ►  October (57)
    • ►  September (54)
    • ►  August (182)
    • ►  July (163)
    • ►  June (115)
    • ►  May (65)
    • ►  April (83)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (77)
    • ►  January (48)
  • ►  2015 (258)
    • ►  December (53)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2014 (115)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ►  2013 (105)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2012 (104)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (152)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (56)
  • ►  2010 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (9)

Followers

Simple theme. Theme images by hdoddema. Powered by Blogger.