Ethics, Info, Tech: Contested Voices, Values, Spaces

My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" was published on Nov. 13, 2025. Purchases can be made via Amazon and this Bloomsbury webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/

Showing posts with label data collection and use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label data collection and use. Show all posts

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Non-traditional little free libraries popping up across Pittsburgh area; CBS News, July 24, 2026

Ricky Sayer , CBS News; Non-traditional little free libraries popping up across Pittsburgh area

"A woman in Dormont is making it her mission to map all of the little free libraries in her community. 

Little free libraries are often placed by neighbors along sidewalks, allowing people to leave books they no longer need as well as encouraging them to take ones that interest them.

Two years ago, Amy Constantine says she and her husband built a little free library for their ever-growing collection of vinyl records, CDs and cassettes. Constantine says they inherited records or were gifted them, and it was a good way for them to get rid of any duplicates.

"Our music that we originally shared is long gone. This is all community music," says Constantine. "The neighborhood's been really generous about turning it over for us, right? We have new inventory all the time."

Constantine says her little free library inspired her to create a map of as many as she could find in her neighborhood. She says she was stunned to learn there were multiple within blocks of her home."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 2:33 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: "community music", access to information, access to things, cultures of sharing, data collection and use, libraries, Library of Things, Little Free Libraries, mapping, non-traditional Little Free Libraries, Pennsylvania

Monday, July 27, 2026

New York school district halts plan to use humanoid robot amid backlash; The New York Times, July 27, 2026

Maya Yang, The New York Times ; New York school district halts plan to use humanoid robot amid backlash

"A New York school district has walked back plans to introduce a humanoid robot at its high school after the proposal sparked backlash from educators and community members.

The Salamanca City Central school district announced on 24 July in a social media post that its pilot project with Toronto-based tech company Realbotix had been put on hold “while we work through enhanced student data privacy agreements with the New York State Education Department and continue engaging with our community and stakeholders”."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 5:46 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: data collection and use, data ethics, humanoid robots, New York, New York State Education Department, privacy, Realbotix, robot uses for education, Salamanca City Central school district, students

Saturday, July 18, 2026

MLB restricts using dugout iPads for AI-assisted in-game strategy; Associated Press via ESPN, July 17, 2026

 Associated Press via ESPN; MLB restricts using dugout iPads for AI-assisted in-game strategy 

"Major League Baseball is restricting iPad usage in dugouts to prevent the tablets from running artificial intelligence to help make strategy decisions, and former reliever Adam Ottavino said the New York Mets' use of technology helped prompt the move.

The tablets have access to video and league-provided data, and also included a custom tab where teams could access other programs. MLB made the custom tabs inaccessible to teams starting Wednesday night, when the second half of the season started.

"In many cases, the custom tab had expanded the use of the dugout iPads beyond their originally intended purpose to include recommendations regarding substitutions, pitch calling, and other in-game decisions traditionally made by players and coaches," MLB executive vice president of baseball operations Morgan Sword wrote in a June 11 memo to general managers, assistant GMs and video coordinators.

The memo, first reported by The Athletic, was obtained by The Associated Press.

"I read the article and I was like, I can't believe what I'm seeing," New York Yankees captain Aaron Judge said. "Teams are making decisions off of AI? Man, that's just crazy."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 2:29 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to data, AI uses by sports teams, AI-assisted game strategy, appearance of impropriety, data collection and use, dugout iPads, fairness, MLB, New York Mets, sports ethics, transparency, unfair advantages via AI

Monday, July 13, 2026

Meta Pulls Instagram AI Update After Everyone Said They Didn't Want to Be Deepfaked; CNET, July 13, 2026

Katelyn Chedraoui, CNET; Meta Pulls Instagram AI Update After Everyone Said They Didn't Want to Be Deepfaked

"After intense backlash last week, Meta pulled the most troubling part of its newest AI update on Instagram. You will no longer be easily able to create deepfakes of other Instagram users.

"We've heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it's no longer available," Meta wrote on Friday in an update to its announcement blog post.

Last week, in an attempt to prove that Meta's billion-dollar leap into generative AI had purpose, the company brought its newest AI image model to Instagram. It came with a new ability to "tag" any public Instagram accounts and include those people in photorealistic AI images -- essentially creating deepfakes."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 11:07 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI deepfakes, AI tech companies, data collection and use, Instagram, Meta, privacy

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Getting campaign text messages ahead of midterms? There could be an AI bot behind it; NPR, July 12, 2026

Maham Javaid, NPR; Getting campaign text messages ahead of midterms? There could be an AI bot behind it

"AI-powered platforms are training bots to sound like political candidates in text messages, holding personalized conversations with thousands of potential voters simultaneously. The bots are also gathering data, learning what each voter wants from their representatives and using that information to shape future campaign messaging."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:10 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to data, access to information, AI Chatbots, AI data collection, AI ethics, campaign text messages, data collection and use, data ethics, democracy, elections, political candidates, privacy

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Meta Now Lets Anyone Use Your Instagram Photos in AI Images—Unless You Opt Out; Wired, July 7, 2026

Reece Rogers, Wired; Meta Now Lets Anyone Use Your Instagram Photos in AI Images—Unless You Opt Out

"META LAUNCHED ITS inaugural AI image model from the Meta Superintelligence Labs on Tuesday, its effort to compete with the likes of OpenAI’s GPT Images 2.0and Google’s Nano Banana 2 in the AI image generation race.

The new model, called Muse Image, rolled out with deep integrations woven into the Instagram app. As part of this update, public Instagram profiles are now automatically opted into being fodder for generative AI remixes. All someone has to do is tag your account’s profile in a prompt—if it’s public—and they can use Meta AI to generate an image using your likeness."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 4:16 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI tech companies, AI-generated images, data collection and use, Instagram photos, Meta, Muse Image, OpenAI, privacy

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

‘Five years in AI is an eternity’: Inside Pittsburgh’s work to govern a technology moving too fast to predict; Pittsburgh's Public Source, June 30, 2026

Alice Crow , Pittsburgh's Public Source; ‘Five years in AI is an eternity’: Inside Pittsburgh’s work to govern a technology moving too fast to predict

"The city decided to work with it, creating standards for generative AI usage. The early policy, which became public in 2024 through a series of Public Source articles, was largely restrictive, designed to curb risky behavior like putting private resident data into commercial AI tools. 

Pittsburgh updated its policy in 2025, designating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as its recommended tool for city employees, meaning data entered into Copilot stays within the city’s Microsoft system and isn’t used to train AI models, according to the policy. 

City employees are also being told which AI tools to use, what information to keep out of them and when to disclose that they’ve used the tech.

Today, as officials set those guardrails, they’re also leaving room for experimentation, asking how AI could improve city work."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:11 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics guardrails, AI policy, AI strategic planning, AI tools, city employees, City of Pittsburgh government, data collection and use, disclosing AI uses, Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, privacy

Monday, June 8, 2026

Have a Thorny Medical Question? Your Doctor May Be Using A.I. for That.; The New York Times, June 8, 2026

Steve Lohr, The New York Times; Have a Thorny Medical Question? Your Doctor May Be Using A.I. for That 

"OpenEvidence’s A.I. app, essentially a chatbot for medicine, has become a viral hit with physicians. Talk to a doctor and chances are he or she uses the app to ask specific medical questions or bounce ideas off it in a diagnostic dialogue.

More than half of the nation’s physicians are regular users. Last month, they used it for 30 million questions and consultations, nearly twice the volume from six months earlier, according to the start-up. A separate survey last year of 1,000 physicians found that 45 percent of them used the app, nearly triple the percentage who used ChatGPT, according to Offcall, a career information service for doctors.

That growth propelled the start-up to a $12 billion valuation in January, up from $3.5 billion last July.

But doctors’ quick adoption of the app since its introduction in 2024 — one of a handful of A.I.-enhanced programs on the market seeking to win over physicians — has heightened concerns about how and when the technology should be used in life-or-death situations. In a high-stakes field like medicine, health care systems are navigating thorny matters of patient privacy, safety and trust, as well as the limitations of the technology itself.

“It’s not an oracle, it’s a tool,” said Daniel Nadler, founder and chief executive of OpenEvidence. “Knowledge and knowledge workers still matter.

The doctor’s office has been a target for computer-assisted decision making for decades, with very limited success until the recent advances of A.I."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:32 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to health information, AI chatbot limitations, AI medical tools, AI use in life-or-death situations, data collection and use, ethics, knowledge workers, medical AI chatbots, OpenEvidence, privacy, trust

Pentagon Cuts 180 Religious Identities From Military Personnel Records; New York Times, June 5, 2026

John IsmayAlexandra E. Petri and Aimee Ortiz, The New York Times; Pentagon Cuts 180 Religious Identities From Military Personnel Records

The new policy, which the Pentagon framed as a largely administrative action, leaves just 31 religious categories to choose from, 22 of which are Christian.

"The Defense Department will no longer allow military service members to claim roughly 180 different religious traditions in their personnel records, leaving just 31 to choose from — 22 of which are Christian denominations.

The change, which was reported earlier by Military.com, was announced on Friday afternoon in a statement posted to social media by Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, who called it “a long overdue move.”

Mr. Parnell framed the change as a largely administrative exercise, intended to simplify data collection for military leaders and chaplains...

Aside from the Christian faiths, the newly consolidated “religious affiliation codes” will allow soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coast Guard and Space Force personnel to identify in their records as agnostic, Baha’i, Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, Jewish or Sikh. Wicca, paganism, humanism and atheism are among those that were removed from the list.

Those who had identified with one of the 180 eliminated faith groups will have just two options under the new policy: “no religion” or “other religions...

In response to the policy change, Rachel Laser of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit religious freedom advocacy organization, said in a statement that Mr. Hegseth “can’t erase the religion of service members whose belief systems he finds less worthy without failing to honor his oath to support and defend the Constitution.”"

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 8:13 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: data collection and use, DoD, faith groups, freedom of religion, military chaplains, military personnel records, Pete Hegseth, reducing religious categories for US military service members, religions

Saturday, June 6, 2026

Oregon prison library worker charged after massive data breach; The Oregonian/OregonLive, June 5, 2026

Noelle Crombie | The Oregonian/OregonLive ; Oregon prison library worker charged after massive data breach

"A former library worker at Snake River Correctional Institution has been indicted on felony computer crime charges after state corrections officials accused her of downloading tens of thousands of internal files.

Demetre Gennette, 37, of Caldwell, Idaho, faces charges of aggravated first-degree theft, first-degree official misconduct, second-degree custodial sexual misconduct and supplying contraband...

Gennette worked as a library coordinator at the prison law library and was fired earlier this year. Snake River in Ontario, the state’s largest prison, has about 2,700 prisoners.

In an interview Friday with The Oregonian/OregonLive, Gennette acknowledged she accessed a large number of files.

She said she turned them over to the Oregon Justice Resource Center, a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of people in prison. She said she also sent it to two attorneys who work on cases involving prisoner welfare."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:40 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: access to sensitive data, alleged misconduct, data collection and use, Demetre Gennette, Oregon, Oregon Justice Resource Center, prison library, Snake River Correctional Institution

Sunday, May 17, 2026

AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency; The Washington Post, May 17, 2026

Annie Gowen, The Washington Post; AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

"The cameras at the heart of the debate are run by Flock Safety, a technology company that has built a network of automatic license plate readers in more than 6,000 communities across the country in recent years. 

Flock’s system uses AI-enabled cameras to snap photos of every vehicle that passes, creating a digital “fingerprint” that includes data as personal as bumper stickers or gun racks.

Flock cameras are beloved by police because officers can use the company’s national database to track vehicle movements to recover drugs and stolen automobiles, and to solve even more serious crimes. A company spokesman said in a statement that the devices support “communities across the country in addressing crime and locating missing people.”...

Yet the company’s rapid expansion has given rise to citizen concerns about intrusive surveillance, worries that have intensified amid reports that federal immigration enforcement officials used the system to target immigrants."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:22 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI license plate cameras, automatic license plate readers, data collection and use, Flock cameras, Flock Safety, ICE, immigrants, privacy, safety, surveillance, Troy NY

Friday, May 1, 2026

Maryland Is First to Ban A.I.-Driven Price Increases in Grocery Stores; The New York Times, May 1, 2026

John S.W. MacDonald, The New York Times; Maryland Is First to Ban A.I.-Driven Price Increases in Grocery Stores

"Maryland this week became the first state in America to ban grocery stores and third-party delivery services like DoorDash from using customers’ personal data to set higher prices.

The practice — supported by artificial intelligence and known as dynamic pricing or surveillance pricing — can lead to two consumers paying different amounts for the same item from the same retailer, at roughly the same time. If a store knows, for example, that one of those customers lives in a wealthier neighborhood, it can charge that person a higher price.

The bill enforcing the ban, the Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, goes into effect on Oct. 1. Merchants face fines of $10,000 for running afoul of the law, and penalties of $25,000 for repeat offenses.

“At a time when technology can predict what we need, when we need it, when we’ll pay for it and also when we’ll pay more for it,” Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland, a Democrat, said at a signing ceremony for the bill on Tuesday. “And at a time when we are watching how big companies are then using those analytics against us to make record profits, Maryland is not just pushing back. Maryland is pushing forward.”"

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 6:57 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI-driven dynamic pricing, data analytics, data collection and use, dynamic pricing, Maryland, privacy, Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, surveillance pricing, Wes Moore

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Man charged with killing Florida doctoral students allegedly consulted ChatGPT; The Guardian, April 27, 2026

Anna Betts , The Guardian; Man charged with killing Florida doctoral students allegedly consulted ChatGPT

"The man charged with killing two University of South Florida doctoral students from Bangladesh allegedly asked ChatGPT about what happens if a person has been put in a garbage bag and “thrown in a dumpster”, according to prosecutors in a court filing."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 10:58 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI Chatbots, asking AI chatbots concerning questions, data collection and use, liability, public safety, responsibility, weighing privacy v. safety and accountability re AI uses

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears; The Guardian, April 21, 2026

Aisha Down and Robert Booth, The Guardian ; Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears

Alarm caused by posts of Alex Karp, tech firm’s CEO, championing US military dominance and of AI weapons

"The US spy tech company Palantir published a manifesto extolling the benefits of American power and implying some cultures are inferior to others – in what MPs have called “a parody of a RoboCop film” and “the ramblings of a supervillain”.

“Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive,” wrote Palantir in a 22-point post on X over the weekend, which also called for an end to the “postwar neutering” of Germany and Japan...

The pronouncement is the most recent of a number of high-profile statements from Palantir and its chief executive, Alex Karp, which appear to indicate that Karp views himself as not simply the head of a software company, but a pundit with important insights into the future of civilisation."...

In an interview with CNBC in early March, Karp suggested that AI would “disrupt” the power of “highly educated, often female voters who vote mostly Democrat”,and instead empower “vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters”."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 12:34 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI, AI ethics, AI tech companies, Alex Karp, Big Tech, data collection and use, Palantir, privacy, spy tech, surveillance, UK

Monday, April 20, 2026

Maryland passes legislation banning retailers from using personal data to set prices. Does it do enough?; WAMU, April 17, 2026

Esther Ciammichilli, Jackson Sinnenberg, WAMU; Maryland passes legislation banning retailers from using personal data to set prices. Does it do enough?

"The Maryland General Assembly passed a bill this week will prohibit food retailers from changing the price of their products – in real time – depending on who is buying them. The practice is called dynamic pricing. 

The new legislation is expected to be signed into law by Governor Wes Moore, who introduced it with leaders in the General Assembly. It will specifically prohibit retailers from using personal protected data to set prices for individual customers. This kind of data includes biometric information like ethnicity, sex, and gender identity...

What made Governor Wes Moore and the assembly leadership want to tackle dynamic pricing during this session?

Well, I think we’ve seen over the last several years this sort of catch up that we’re doing. Technology is moving so fast and the tech companies are finding more and more ways to exploit, really, the data, the algorithms, what they know about us in ways that are really harmful to consumers.

Over the last few years we’ve had several bills that are about protecting biodynamics, protecting consumer privacy, protecting the use of data without people’s permission. I think over the last year we saw a new way that these tech companies and these large corporations are finding ways to combine data brokers, private personal data, in a way that’s really harmful to consumers, in a way that really exploits consumers. And so this year, this is what we tackled.

During the final debate over the bill last week, you said, “One of the largest corporations in the world is announcing to their shareholders technology which they will patent to be able to adjust prices based on personal data.” Can you elaborate on the details of that announcement?

Yeah, so, you know, Walmart is …  they’re not going to have paper tags on their grocery stores anymore on there for for their prices. They’re gonna have these little screens that can change immediately. Digital screens to price your milk and your eggs and flour and and whatever else.

But what this technology allows them to do ultimately is to figure out who’s standing in front of that screen and change the price based on who you are. And that’s really the thing that we’re trying to get ahead of with this legislation."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 3:15 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: AI algorithms, bias, biometric data, consumer exploitation, consumer privacy, data collection and use, dynamic pricing, food retailers, Maryland, patents, PII, privacy, sensitive data, using personal data to set prices, Walmart

Sunday, April 5, 2026

What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots; The New York Times, April 4, 2026

Kashmir Hill

Photographs by Frances F. Denny

, The New York Times ; What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots

"There are a growing number of companies offering social chatbots that can act like friends, enemies, lovers, adventurous companions, or the manifestation of a fictional or real person you’ve always wanted to meet. You can pick A.I. Elon Musk’s brain or spar with A.I. Draco Malfoy. The myriad characters, often created by fellow users, offer drama, romance, therapy and LOLs.

Apps that feature role-playing chatbots are used by tens of millions of people, with engagement times that rival or surpass those of social media behemoths such as TikTok, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. The majority of teens surveyed by Pew use A.I. chatbots, with one out of 11 saying they had used Character.AI.

“If you think your child is not talking to chatbot companions, you’re probably wrong,” said Mitch Prinstein, co-director of the Winston Center on Technology and Brain Development at U.N.C. Chapel Hill.

Chatbots are surging in popularity as society is still grappling with how social media has affected young people; a wave of lawsuits is moving through the courts seeking damages from companies that plaintiffs say have deliberately created addictive products. (A jury in California recently found that Meta and YouTube were liable for $6 million in damages to one young woman.) And now parents and caregivers have a new attention-absorbing technology to reckon with.

At the beginning of last year, a high school teacher in Chicago told me that some of her students were dating chatbots, and she worried that they were having their first erotic experiences with them. I wanted to find out what teens had to say about that, so I joined communities devoted to social chatbot apps on the online messaging forum Discord. I introduced myself as a reporter and “an old,” and explained that I was interested in talking to young people who used the services regularly."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 5:03 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: addiction, addictive product design, AI Chatbots, AI companions, attention-absorbing tech, children, data collection and use, privacy, product liability, role-playing chatbots, social chatbots, social media, teens

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

I broke up with my Kindle. My new e-reader treats me better.; The Washington Post, March 31, 2026

Michael J. Coren, The Washington Post; I broke up with my Kindle. My new e-reader treats me better.

After Amazon’s Kindle removed my ability to download and back up my own e-books, I went in search of an alternative.


"As corporate walled gardens have replaced the freewheeling, open internet of the 1990s and 2000s, we’ve ceded control over almost everything about our online experience. Nearly every keystroke, swipe and tap is now monitored, recorded and analyzed for potential profit.


The Kindle ecosystem is perhaps the apotheosis of this shift. One Guardian reporter found Amazon had recorded every title, highlight and page turn on her Kindle app (40,000 entries over two years). The company’s dominance sets the terms for everyone in the marketplace.


Including me. Like tens of millions of others, I have owned a Kindle (a Paperwhite). Last year, it started to feel as if it owned me. The final straw was when Kindle removed my ability to download and back up my own e-books. So I went in search of an alternative.


I bought a Kobo.


Was it the bibliophile Eden some Kobo fans described? Not quite. The reality was messier than I expected. It turns out we can’t escape Big Brother on our e-readers just yet. But a more open society is coming into view for book lovers — and perhaps all of us.


Here’s how to turn the page."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 1:25 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 1st sale doctrine, access, access to information, Amazon, copyright law, data collection and use, ebooks, ereaders, Kindle, Kobo, licensing, no digital 1st Sale Doctrine, privacy

Sunday, February 15, 2026

The problem with doorbell cams: Nancy Guthrie case and Ring Super Bowl ad reawaken surveillance fears; The Guardian, February 14, 2026

Sanya Mansoor , The Guardian; The problem with doorbell cams: Nancy Guthrie case and Ring Super Bowl ad reawaken surveillance fears

"What happens to the data that smart home cameras collect? Can law enforcement access this information – even when users aren’t aware officers may be viewing their footage? Two recent events have put these concerns in the spotlight.

A Super Bowl ad by the doorbell-camera company Ring and the FBI’s pursuit of the kidnapper of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of Today show host Savannah Guthrie, have resurfaced longstanding concerns about surveillance against a backdrop of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown. The fear is that home cameras’ video feeds could become yet another part of the government’s mass surveillance apparatus...

“Ring has a history of playing it pretty loose with people’s privacy rights,” said Beryl Lipton, senior investigative researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In 2023, the Federal Trade Commission charged the company with “compromising its customers’ privacy by allowing any employee or contractor to access consumers’ private videos and by failing to implement basic privacy and security protections”. This, in turn, allowed hackers to “take control of consumers’ accounts, cameras, and videos”. Ring agreed to pay $5.8m in a settlement with the FTC."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 5:31 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amazon, data collection and use, data retention, DHS, Flock, home camera videos, ICE, mass surveillance, Nancy Guthrie, Nest, privacy rights, Ring, safety, security, smart home cameras, spying, surveillance cameras

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Trump may be the beginning of the end for ‘enshittification’ – this is our chance to make tech good again; The Guardian, January 10, 2026

Cory Doctorow, The Guardian ; Trump may be the beginning of the end for ‘enshittification’ – this is our chance to make tech good again

"Until we repeal the anti-circumvention law, we can’t reverse-engineer the US’s cloud software, whether it’s a database, a word processor or a tractor, in order to swap out proprietary, American code for robust, open, auditable alternatives that will safeguard our digital sovereignty. The same goes for any technology tethered to servers operated by any government that might have interests adverse to ours – say, the solar inverters and batteries we buy from China.

This is the state of play at the dawn of 2026. The digital rights movement has two powerful potential coalition partners in the fight to reclaim the right of people to change how their devices work, to claw back privacy and a fair deal from tech: investors and national security hawks.

Admittedly, the door is only open a crack, but it’s been locked tight since the turn of the century. When it comes to a better technology future, “open a crack” is the most exciting proposition I’ve heard in decades."

Posted by Kip Currier, PhD, JD at 9:59 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: anti-circumvention laws, data collection and use, digital rights movement, digital sovereignty, DMCA, investors, IP, national security, privacy, reverse-engineering digital devices, Right to Repair, tech companies
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information.Education: PhD, University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences (2007); Juris Doctor (JD), University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS), University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences. Member of American Bar Association (ABA), ABA IP Law Section, ABA Science & Technology Section; Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T); Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE)
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (1181)
    • ▼  August (20)
      • Team Trump Trolls Taylor Swift With Song Use Befor...
      • OpenAI to pause some work on AI model Astra due to...
      • Law expert says Buc-ee’s faces uphill battle in Be...
      • Judge orders Meta to pay over $900 million for fai...
      • The A.I. Giants Weren’t Prepared for This; The New...
      • I’m Begging You: Never Write With A.I.; The New Yo...
      • Coming to some of Pennsylvania’s most picturesque ...
      • Why is Anthropic destroying books?; The Guardian, ...
      • Legal Battle Over U.S. Copyright Chief Heats Up Ag...
      • Democracy is at stake when foolish humans bet on m...
      • U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon Issues N...
      • White House AI Guidelines Exempt U.S. Open Models ...
      • Authors weigh in on $1.5 billion Anthropic AI copy...
      • ICE, A DATA CENTER & A TOWN DIVIDED; Pittsburgh's ...
      • For those with criminal records, AI is breaking do...
      • How the Reflecting Pool Vandalism Case Fell Apart;...
      • A bruising 24 hours - what next for Fifa and under...
      • In Dropping Reflecting Pool Case, Pirro Draws Trum...
      • German court rules AI music firm Suno broke copyri...
      • 'I thought it was a joke': Tarot reader sues borou...
    • ►  July (130)
    • ►  June (176)
    • ►  May (167)
    • ►  April (212)
    • ►  March (123)
    • ►  February (165)
    • ►  January (188)
  • ►  2025 (1602)
    • ►  December (219)
    • ►  November (180)
    • ►  October (119)
    • ►  September (95)
    • ►  August (138)
    • ►  July (150)
    • ►  June (224)
    • ►  May (114)
    • ►  April (95)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (108)
    • ►  January (80)
  • ►  2024 (878)
    • ►  December (81)
    • ►  November (96)
    • ►  October (223)
    • ►  September (85)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (87)
    • ►  June (81)
    • ►  May (39)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (29)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2023 (510)
    • ►  December (45)
    • ►  November (39)
    • ►  October (91)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (63)
    • ►  July (84)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2022 (312)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (61)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (53)
  • ►  2021 (145)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2020 (222)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (60)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2019 (335)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (81)
  • ►  2018 (611)
    • ►  December (68)
    • ►  November (77)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (43)
    • ►  August (60)
    • ►  July (47)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (80)
    • ►  March (68)
    • ►  February (57)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2017 (561)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (81)
    • ►  June (100)
    • ►  May (91)
    • ►  April (52)
    • ►  March (64)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (71)
  • ►  2016 (1106)
    • ►  December (65)
    • ►  November (117)
    • ►  October (57)
    • ►  September (54)
    • ►  August (182)
    • ►  July (163)
    • ►  June (115)
    • ►  May (65)
    • ►  April (83)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (77)
    • ►  January (48)
  • ►  2015 (258)
    • ►  December (53)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2014 (115)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ►  2013 (105)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2012 (104)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (152)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (56)
  • ►  2010 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (9)

Followers

Simple theme. Theme images by hdoddema. Powered by Blogger.