AI firms push to use copyrighted content freely; Axios, March 20, 2025

 Ina Fried, Axios; AI firms push to use copyrighted content freely

"A sharp divide over AI engines' free use of copyrighted material has emerged as a key conflict among the firms and groups that recently flooded the White House with advice on its forthcoming "AI Action Plan."

Why it matters: Copyright infringement claims were among the first legal challenges following ChatGPT's launch, with multiple lawsuits now winding their way through the courts.

Driving the news: In their White House memos, OpenAI and Google argue that their  use of copyrighted material for AI is a matter of national security — and if that use is limited, China will gain an unfair edge in the AI race."

Law Firm Bends in Face of Trump Demands; The New York Times, March 20, 2025

Michael S. Schmidt, The New York Times ; Law Firm Bends in Face of Trump Demands

[Kip Currier: This law firm's capitulation and transactionalism epitomizes the definition of craven: 

contemptibly lacking in courage; cowardly

It's also a terrible precedent to set for the rule of law, the legal profession, and democracy.]

[Excerpt]

"President Trump and the head of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP have reached a deal under which Mr. Trump will drop the executive order he leveled against the firm, Mr. Trump said on Thursday.

In the deal, Mr. Trump said, the firm agreed to a series of commitments, including to represent clients no matter their political affiliation and contribute $40 million in legal services to causes Mr. Trump has championed, including “the President’s Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, and other mutually agreed projects.

It’s unclear how the money will be used to help the task force. The firm, Mr. Trump said, also agreed to conduct an audit to ensure its hiring practices are merit based “and will not adopt, use, or pursue any DEI policies.”"

The opposite of fascism: Living well and fighting back in a time of terrors; The Ink, March 19, 2025

ANAND GIRIDHARADAS, The Ink; The opposite of fascism

Living well and fighting back in a time of terrors

"It’s tempting to think that the opposite of authoritarianism, of this nightmare we are living through, is an opposite politics.

And, indeed, the ongoing hijacking of the United States by broligarchs and MAGA minions requires a ferocious political response.

But everyone I talk to is drained by this responding, drained by the burden of constant vigilance, drained by the always-on coup, drained by the ping-ping-ping of executive actions and court orders and protests and town halls and threats and disappearances.

And often people confess guilt.

Guilt for doing anything but this civic duty they feel.

Guilt for having a good time out of doors.

Guilt for being with friends.

Guilt for saying they are doing fine, thank you, in fact great, actually, if they’re being honest, except for the whole world thing.

I want to suggest to you that you don’t need to feel this guilt. The best revenge against these grifters and bigots and billionaires and bullies is to live well, richly, together.

The best revenge is to refuse their values. To embody the kind of living — free, colorful, open — they want to snuff out. 

So when they dehumanize, you humanize.

When they try to fracture and divide people, you connect with people.

When they try to curtail the freedom to associate, you gather.

When they try to make it harder to speak your mind, you find your voice.

When they try to make you cynical, you double down on hope.

When they try to drown you in reacting to each little thing, you remember the far-off “beautiful tomorrow” you are fighting for.

When they try to consume you night and day, you reserve time for your garden or cooking or the feeling of your kid’s breath on your cheek as you cuddle.

They want all of all of us, and they want to saturate our beings only for them and their purposes — as fodder for their machines. They want politics to eat your dreams.

And so living well, and living in community, and living with others, and taking care of your people, and even not your people, is not just self-care in order to keep fighting. That was the 2016 idea. It is actually inseparable from resisting their big project.

Because having, and nurturing, in your life a sphere for joy and connection and community and love and food and music and human difference and living and letting live is everything they are not and is everything they are trying to take away.

Be what scares them. Live lives in colors their eyes can’t even see. Cook food they want to deport. Test the fire code with your parties. Form a scene that meets every Wednesday. Call someone you haven’t in a while. Fight with a smile. Fail and come back. Be weird. Be welcoming. Kiss converts. Refuse despair. Be disobedient. Laugh loudly. Hide someone. Call out. Root down.

They are waging a war on living. The more fully you live, the harder their job will be."

Jackie Robinson’s Pentagon Page Removed—Then Restored—In DEI Purge; Forbes, March 19, 2025

Sara Dorn, Forbes ; Jackie Robinson’s Pentagon Page Removed—Then Restored—In DEI Purge

"A webpage dedicated to baseball star Jackie Robinson’s military career was removed from the Department of Defense website this week in the Pentagon’s purge of content it deems aligned with diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives—but was later restored after the agency suggested it was a “mistake.”...

The page was “mistakenly” removed in the DEI purge, an unnamed Department of Defense official told ABC News, adding that it and others that had been taken down — including those honoring the Tuskegee Airmen, the Marines at Iwo Jima and Navajo Code Talkers — would be restored.

Pentagon Press Secretary John Ullyot said in a statement to Forbes that errors are corrected “in rare cases that content is removed—either deliberately or by mistake—that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive.”

Ullyot defended the Trump administration’s directive to dismantle DEI initiatives at the agency, however, referring to the acronym as “Discriminatory Equity Ideology” which he said “is a form of Woke cultural Marxism that Divides the force, Erodes unit cohesion and Interferes with services’ core warfighting mission.”"

Jackie Robinson’s Army story deleted in Defense Department DEI purge; The Washington Post, March 19, 2025

Cindy Boren

 and 

Andrew Golden

, The Washington Post; Jackie Robinson’s Army story deleted in Defense Department DEI purge

[Kip Currier: Another purge of a story about a person of color from the Department of Defense (DoD) website, just as we knew has been happening, following the Trump anti-DEI executive order. This purged site is about legendary Major League Baseball (MLB) player Jackie Robinson. As with the example a few days ago regarding Medal of Honor recipient Maj Gen Charles Calvin Rogers, the label "DEI" was added to Jackie Robinson's URL.

Thankfully, the story about Jackie Robinson is still accessible via the Internet Archive.

These kinds of purges of digital information about historically disadvantaged persons are akin to the challenging and banning of books that disproportionately are targeted against books by marginalized authors and/or about marginalized persons, which some do not want people to be able to access.

Thank libraries, archives, museums, and non-profit organizations like the Internet Archive that work tirelessly to promote access to diverse information sources and preserve information in myriad formats for all to be able to freely access.]

[Exceprt]

"An article telling the story of the Army career of Jackie Robinson, the Hall of Fame hero who broke Major League Baseball’s color barrier in 1947, no longer is accessible on the Department of Defense website’s series on athletes who served, apparently removed in a purge of articles related to diversity, equity and inclusion.

Robinson, described by President Trump last month as helping “drive our country forward to greatness,” served in the Army during World War II. On Tuesday night ESPN’S Jeff Passan noted that “DEI” had been added to the URL on a page about Robinson’s military past. As of Wednesday morning, the story has been taken down, but it remains available through the Internet Archive."

U.S. Marine Band forced to cancel concert with students of color after Trump DEI order; 60 Minutes, March 16, 2025

60 Minutes; U.S. Marine Band forced to cancel concert with students of color after Trump DEI order

"After an executive order ending DEI initiatives, the U.S. Marine Band canceled a concert featuring young musicians of color. Veterans stepped in to mentor the aspiring musicians."

DC Circuit rules AI-generated work ineligible for copyright; Courthouse News Service, March 18, 2025

 MEGAN BUTLER, Courthouse News Service; DC Circuit rules AI-generated work ineligible for copyright

"In a landmark opinion over the copyrightability of works created by artificial intelligence, a D.C. Circuit panel ruled on Tuesday that human authorship is required for copyright protection.

As AI technology quickly advances and intertwines with human creations, the unanimous opinion lays down the first precedential marker over who or what is the author of work created solely by artificial intelligence under copyright law.

The case stems from Dr. Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist who creates and works with artificial intelligence systems and created a generative artificial intelligence named the “Creativity Machine.”"

Pentagon restores webpage for Black Medal of Honor winner but defends DEI purge; The Guardian, March 17, 2025

Maya Yang, The Guardian; Pentagon restores webpage for Black Medal of Honor winner but defends DEI purge

[Kip Currier: In my comments on a prior Guardian story yesterday, I noted that although it's good that the webpage for Maj. Gen. Rogers has been restored and the pejorative label "DEImedal" has been removed from the website address, we are left with many troubling concerns and questions. Chief among them: how many other websites have been temporarily or permanently removed and/or altered that relate to marginalized persons?

Now, we have a clearer picture, from this Guardian and Associated Press reporting:

In all, thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups have been taken down in efforts to delete material promoting diversity, equity and inclusion – an action that Parnell defended at a briefing.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/17/defense-department-black-medal-honor-webpage-restored 

These purges more than ever underscore the vital work of people and institutions who are collecting, archiving, and preserving digital records; people like archivists and library and museum staffs. Remember this when someone shortsightedly or misguidedly asks whether libraries, archives, and museums are still needed in the Internet and AI ages.

Other non-profit organizations, too, such as the Internet Archive and its digital preservation-missioned Wayback Machine, are crucial for preserving as much information and as many webpages as possible.

Digital preservation of the information and webpages removed by entities like the current Trump administration could eventually enable that information to be restored. It is imperative that everyone have access to the full breadth of human experience and history, rather than the fragmented shards of history and lived experiences that a particular political administration deems acceptable.

Access to information is a core principle of healthy, well-functioning, responsive democracies. As the late Pulitzer Prize winner Toni Morrison sagely asserted, "Access to knowledge is the superb, the supreme act of truly great civilizations."]

[Excerpt]

A screenshot posted on Bluesky by the writer Brandon Friedman noted that a Google preview continued to show the defense department’s profile page – noting of Rogers that, “as a Black man, he worked for gender and race equality while in the service”. Friedman added that the page no longer worked and the URL had been “changed to include ‘DEI medal’”.

By Monday, however, the site was operational once more – and the URL had returned to its original formulation, with the letters DEI no longer present.

In a statement on Monday that did not elaborate, a defense department spokesperson told the Guardian: “The department has restored the Medal of Honor story about army Maj Gen Charles Calvin Rogers … The story was removed during auto removal process.”

While the defense department also claimed publicly on Monday that internet pages honoring Rogers, as well as Japanese American service members, had been taken down mistakenly, spokesperson Sean Parnell also staunchly defended its overall campaign to strip out content singling out the contributions by women and minority groups, which the Trump administration considers “DEI”.

“I think the president and the secretary have been very clear on this – that anybody that says in the Department of Defense that diversity is our strength is, is frankly, incorrect,” Parnell said.

In all, thousands of pages honoring contributions by women and minority groups have been taken down in efforts to delete material promoting diversity, equity and inclusion – an action that Parnell defended at a briefing.

The defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and Donald Trump have already removed the only female four-star officer on the joint chiefs of staff, navy Adm Lisa Franchetti, and removed its Black chairperson, Gen CQ Brown Jr.”

Pentagon webpage for Black Medal of Honor winner restored after outcry; The Guardian, March 17, 2025

Maya Yang, The Guardian; Pentagon webpage for Black Medal of Honor winner restored after outcry

[Kip Currier: Speaking out against injustice can work: The Department of Defense has restored the webpage honoring Medal of Honor recipient Maj. Gen. Charles Calvin Rogers and has removed the pejorative "DEImedal" label that had been added to the webpage, after enough people apparently called out Pete Hegseth et al.

• How many other people like Maj. Gen Rogers, though, are being "disappeared" and made invisible? 
• Whose histories and struggles and achievements are being purged from historical records?
• How many other websites are being removed?

Recent examples tell us that that number is likely to be many, many people. For example, only after a similar outcry when the U.S. Air Force removed a video about the Tuskegee Airmen and Women's Airfare Service Pilots (WASPs) from a military training course "after President Donald Trump issued a sweeping order barring DEI programs from the federal government and military", did the Air Force reinstate the materials about the Airmen and WASPs.

The take-away: we need people to continue to raise the alarm when instances are spotted like those above.

And we need to then spread the word quickly and demand that such purges be remedied and the original information restored.

History is NOT the possession of one group or movement.

History -- accurate, genuine, unexpurgated, accessible history -- is the collective birthright and legacy of all the American people and peoples of the world.

Censoring or eliminating the story of one person diminishes the entire chronicle of humanity.]

[Excerpt]

"The US defense department webpage celebrating a Black Medal of Honor recipient that was removed and had the letters “DEI” added to the site’s address has been restored – and the letters scrubbed – after an outcry."

Black Medal of Honor recipient removed from US Department of Defense website; The Guardian, March 16, 2024

Maya Yang, The Guardian ; Black Medal of Honor recipient removed from US Department of Defense website

[Kip Currier: Shame on Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and all those responsible for dishonoring this deserving veteran by removing him from the Department of Defense website and adding DEI to the website's URL, as if the acronym DEI (i.e. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) is a mark of infamy and dishonor.

The essence of DEI is ethically-grounded and has been and is still about (1) recognizing that human beings are made up of near infinite varieties of individual and collective qualities, (2) righting historical wrongs that have been done to groups of people, (3) inviting everyone to share their voices and votes in the democratic experiment, and (4) having an equal opportunity for "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".

Believing and knowing that these kinds of spiteful acts -- like this one done to the late Maj. Gen. Charles Calvin Rogers -- against individuals and communities who have experienced genuine marginalization and/or who have fought against injustice and discrimination will someday be overturned and rightfully remedied keeps my spirit hopeful and optimistic for the long term.

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.]

[Excerpt]

"The US defense department webpage celebrating an army general who served in the Vietnam war and was awarded the country’s highest military decoration has been removed and the letters “DEI” added to the site’s address.

On Saturday, US army Maj Gen Charles Calvin Rogers’s Medal of Honor webpage led to a “404” error message. The URL was also changed, with the word “medal” changed to “deimedal”.

Rogers, who was awarded the Medal of Honor by then president Richard Nixon in 1970, served in the Vietnam war, where he was wounded three times while leading the defense of a base.

According to the West Virginia military hall of fame, Rogers was the highest-ranking African American to receive the medal. After his death in 1990, Rogers’s remains were buried at the Arlington national cemetery in Washington DC, and in 1999 a bridge in Fayette county, where Rogers was born, was renamed the Charles C Rogers Bridge."

Ethics expert breaks down Trump administration’s conflicts of interest; PBS News, March 14, 2025

Laura Barrón-López, Ian Cousins, Doug Adams, PBS News ; Ethics expert breaks down Trump administration’s conflicts of interest

"It’s been less than two months since President Trump took office. In that time, Trump, his family and administration members have seen personal and financial gain in ways aided by their power and influence. This week, the president lined up Teslas at the White House to help Elon Musk as Tesla stocks plummeted. Laura Barrón-López discussed more with Don Fox."

Russell T Davies: gay society in ‘greatest danger I’ve ever seen’ after Trump win; The Guardian, March 16, 2025

Hannah Al-Othman , The Guardian; Russell T Davies: gay society in ‘greatest danger I’ve ever seen’ after Trump win

"Russell T Davies has said gay society is in the “greatest danger I have ever seen”, since the election of Donald Trump as US president in November.

Speaking to the Guardian at the Gaydio Pride awards in Manchester on Friday, the Doctor Who screenwriter said the rise in hostility was not limited to the US but “is here [in the UK] now”.

“As a gay man, I feel like a wave of anger, and violence, and resentment is heading towards us on a vast scale,” he said.

“I’ve literally seen a difference in the way I’m spoken to as a gay man since that November election, and that’s a few months of weaponising hate speech, and the hate speech creeps into the real world.”

“I’m not being alarmist,” he added. “I’m 61 years old. I know gay society very, very well, and I think we’re in the greatest danger I have ever seen.”...

Davies also used his keynote speech at the awards ceremony, which rewards the efforts made to improve the lives of LGBTQ+ people in the UK, to criticise Trump, and the president’s ally Elon Musk.

“I think times are darkening beyond all measure and beyond anything I have seen in my lifetime,” he told the audience, which included the singers Louise Redknapp and Katy B, and the Traitors contestants Leanne Quigley and Minah Shannon.

Davies said he had turned 18 and left home in 1981, adding: “And that is exactly the year that rumours and whispers of a strange new virus came along, which came to haunt our community and to test us in so many ways.”

“The joyous thing about this is that we fought back,” he said. The community “militarised, campaigned, marched and demanded the medicine”.

He added: “We demanded the science. We demanded the access.”...

But the peril the gay community now faced, he said, was even greater than that in the 1980s.

“The threat from America, it’s like something at The Lord of the Rings. It’s like an evil rising in the west, and it is evil,” Davies said.

“We’ve had bad prime ministers and we’ve had bad presidents before. What we’ve never had is a billionaire tech baron openly hating his trans daughter,” he added.

Musk, the de facto head of the “department of government efficiency”, bought the social networking site Twitter, which he renamed X. A study by the University of California, Berkeley found hate speech on the platform rose by 50% in the months after it was bought by the billionaire.

“We have never had this in the history of the world,” Davies said. “It is terrifying because he and the people like him are in control of the facts, they’re in control of information, they’re in control of what people think, and that is what we’re now facing.”

But Davies said the gay community would do “what we always do in times of peril, we gather at night”, and would once again come together, and fight against this latest wave of hostility and oppression.

“What we will do in Elon Musk’s world, that we’re heading towards, is what artists have always done,” he told the Guardian, “which is to meet in cellars, and plot, and sing, and compose, and paint, and make speeches, and march.”

“If we have to be those rebels in basements yet again,” he added, “which is when art thrives, then that’s what we’ll become.”"

How a New Zealander working from her mum’s kitchen started a news service read by Madonna; The Guardian, March 14, 2025

Eva Corlett , The Guardian; How a New Zealander working from her mum’s kitchen started a news service read by Madonna

"Blakiston is the founder of the online media platform Shit You Should Care About, a company that says it “cuts through the bullshit” to make global issues and news accessible for broader and younger audiences.

She trawls news websites to pull together easy-to-read stories on everything from celebrity culture to news on conflicts, which she then boils down to digestible snippets to share on Instagram, X and TikTok. Fans can also subscribe to a free newsletter and tune into podcasts, while paying subscribers fund the business.

What began as a blog with her friends Ruby Edwards and Olivia Mercer in 2018, Shit You Should Care About has since amassed nearly four million followers on social media, including celebrities Bella Hadid, Madonna and, to Blakiston’s surprise, Joe Rogan. It has more than 80,000 newsletter subscribers, and has spawned a podcast series and book titled Make It Make Sense. Nearly half of the platform’s followers are based in the US, with another roughly 30% in the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

The company’s success lies in meeting Blakiston’s generation where they are: social media."

The AI Copyright Battle: Why OpenAI And Google Are Pushing For Fair Use; Forbes, March 15, 2025

 Virginie Berger , Forbes; The AI Copyright Battle: Why OpenAI And Google Are Pushing For Fair Use

"Furthermore, the ongoing lawsuits against AI firms could serve as a necessary correction to push the industry toward genuinely intelligent machine learning models instead of data-compression-based generators masquerading as intelligence. If legal challenges force AI firms to rethink their reliance on copyrighted content, it could spur innovation toward creating more advanced, ethically sourced AI systems...

Recommendations: Finding a Sustainable Balance

A sustainable solution must reconcile technological innovation with creators' economic interests. Policymakers should develop clear federal standards specifying fair use parameters for AI training, considering solutions such as:

• Licensing and Royalties: Transparent licensing arrangements compensating creators whose work is integral to AI datasets.
• Curated Datasets: Government or industry-managed datasets explicitly approved for AI training, ensuring fair compensation.
• Regulated Exceptions: Clear legal definitions distinguishing transformative use in AI training contexts.

These nuanced policies could encourage innovation without sacrificing creators’ rights.

The lobbying by OpenAI and Google reveals broader tensions between rapid technological growth and ethical accountability. While national security concerns warrant careful consideration, they must not justify irresponsible regulation or ethical compromises. A balanced approach, preserving innovation, protecting creators’ rights, and ensuring sustainable and ethical AI development, is critical for future global competitiveness and societal fairness."

OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use; Ars Technica, March 13, 2025

 ASHLEY BELANGER  , Ars Technica; OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use

"OpenAI is hoping that Donald Trump's AI Action Plan, due out this July, will settle copyright debates by declaring AI training fair use—paving the way for AI companies' unfettered access to training data that OpenAI claims is critical to defeat China in the AI race.

Currently, courts are mulling whether AI training is fair use, as rights holders say that AI models trained on creative works threaten to replace them in markets and water down humanity's creative output overall.

OpenAI is just one AI company fighting with rights holders in several dozen lawsuits, arguing that AI transforms copyrighted works it trains on and alleging that AI outputs aren't substitutes for original works.

So far, one landmark ruling favored rights holders, with a judge declaring AI training is not fair use, as AI outputs clearly threatened to replace Thomson-Reuters' legal research firm Westlaw in the market, Wired reported. But OpenAI now appears to be looking to Trump to avoid a similar outcome in its lawsuits, including a major suit brought by The New York Times."

Trump targets libraries and state-funded media organizations amid Voice of America’s staff cut; The Independent, March 15, 2025

Gustaf Kilander, The Independent; Trump targets libraries and state-funded media organizations amid Voice of America’s staff cut

"The Trump administration continued its gutting of the federal government on Saturday as it began making significant cuts to Voice of America and other state-operated programming supportive of democratic ideals. 

As Congress passed government funding on Friday night, Trump ordered the administration to cut back the functions of a number of agencies as much as possible in accordance with the law. One of the affected institutions was the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Asia, as well as Radio Marti, which broadcasts news in Spanish in Cuba. 

In an executive order signed late on Friday, Trump eviscerated a number of smaller offices and agencies that do everything from battling homelessness to funding libraries.

The order stated that the agencies and offices will see their federal grants reviewed. The grants will be “eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.”...

The advocacy group said it “condemns this decision as a departure from the U.S.’s historic role as a defender of free information and calls on the U.S. government to restore VOA and urges Congress and the international community to take action against this unprecedented move.”...

The latest reductions are especially provocative because the Agency for Global Media is an independent agency chartered by Congress, which passed a law in 2020 limiting the power of the agency’s presidentially appointed executives. Trump has already taken several moves to gut congressionally-mandated programs, setting up a potential Supreme Court showdown over the limits of presidential power.

Trump also took aim at the Institute of Museum and Library Services, an agency that supports libraries, archives, and museums in all U.S. states."

The Authoritarian Endgame on Higher Education; The New York Times, March 15, 2025

The Editorial Board, The New York Times; The Authoritarian Endgame on Higher Education

"When a political leader wants to move a democracy toward a more authoritarian form of government, he often sets out to undermine independent sources of information and accountability. The leader tries to delegitimize judges, sideline autonomous government agencies and muzzle the media. President Vladimir Putin of Russia has done so over the past quarter-century. To lesser degrees, Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey recently have as well.

The weakening of higher education tends to be an important part of this strategy. Academic researchers are supposed to pursue the truth, and budding autocrats recognize that empirical truth can present a threat to their authority. “Wars are won by teachers,” Mr. Putin has said. He and Mr. Erdogan have closed universities. Mr. Modi’s government has arrested dissident scholars, and Mr. Orban has appointed loyal foundations to run universities.

President Trump has not yet gone as far to impede democracy as these other leaders, but it would be naïve to ignore his early moves to mimic their approach. He has fired government watchdogs, military leaders, prosecutors and national security experts. He has sued media organizations, and his administration has threatened to regulate others. He has suggested that judges are powerless to check his authority, writing on social media, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

Mr. Trump’s multifaceted campaign against higher education is core to this effort to weaken institutions that do not parrot his version of reality. Above all, he is enacting or considering major cuts to universities’ resources. The Trump administration has announced sharp reductions in the federal payments that cover the overhead costs of scientific research, such as laboratory rent, electricity and hazardous waste disposal. (A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against those cuts.) Vice President JD Vance and other Republicans have urged a steep increase of a university endowment tax that Mr. Trump signed during his first term. Together, these two policies could reduce the annual budgets at some research universities by more than 10 percent."

Trump's White House Tesla showcase for Musk raises ethics concerns; ABC News, March 12, 2025

 Ivan Pereira, ABC News; Trump's White House Tesla showcase for Musk raises ethics concerns

"President Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s controversial showcase of Tesla cars in front of the White House has set off alarms around Washington over what some see as an infomercial for the billionaire’s car company on high-profile government property.

Ethics experts ABC News spoke with are raising concerns that the Tuesday event could blur or even cross the lines of what's considered proper conduct by elected officials."

Musk Retweets ‘Hitler Didn’t Murder Millions’ Message Amid Ongoing Nazi Controversy; Forbes, March 13, 2025

Antonio Pequeño IV , Forbes; Musk Retweets ‘Hitler Didn’t Murder Millions’ Message Amid Ongoing Nazi Controversy

"Tesla chief and presidential adviser Elon Musk shared a post Thursday that said public sector workers, not Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, murdered millions of people, marking the billionaire’s latest Nazi-related post as he and his electric vehicle company face continued backlash and boycotts as critics say his embrace of right-wing politics is veering more extreme."

DOGE says it’s saved the federal government $115 billion. Experts say the figures don’t stack up.; Fortune, March 13, 2025

BEATRICE NOLAN , Fortune; DOGE says it’s saved the federal government $115 billion. Experts say the figures don’t stack up.

The Copyright Office takes on the sticky issue of artificial intelligence; Federal News Network, March 11, 2025

Tom Temin, Federal News Network; The Copyright Office takes on the sticky issue of artificial intelligence

"Artificial intelligence raises storms of questions in every domain it touches. Chief among them, copyright questions. Now the U.S. Copyright Office, a congressional agency, has completed the second of two studies of AI and copyrights. This one deals with whether you can copyright outputs created using AI. Emily Chapuis, the Copyright Office’s deputy general counsel, joined the Federal Drive with Tom Temin to discuss...

Emily Chapuis: Yeah. That’s right. So we don’t recommend in the report that Congress take any action. And the reason for this is we think that copyright law is sufficiently flexible to deal with changes in technology. And that’s not just based on AI, but on the entire history of copyright law, has had to deal with these questions, whether it’s the development of the camera or the internet. The questions about copyright ability are always on a case-by-case basis. And the technology that’s used and how it’s used and what it’s used for are important elements of that. But the sort of defining legal principles aren’t different in this context than in those other ones.

Tom Temin: Right. So the human input idea then is kind of an eternal for copyright. How do you decide that? Is it a percentage of human input? Because the machine does a lot here. But you could say, ‘Well, the camera did a lot when it opened and closed the shutter and exposed silver halide. And then there was a machine process to produce that image. But it was the selection, the timing, the decisive moment.’ To quote Henri Cartier-Bresson, another French photographer. That’s really the issue here. The human input and not the machine input.

Emily Chapuis: Yeah, that’s right. And it’s hard to parse. I mean, we’ve had people ask, so what’s the percentage that has to be human created? And there’s not a clear answer to that, again, because it’s case by case. But also the question isn’t really amount as much as it is control. So who’s controlling the expression. And so one of the things that we try to explain is that even the same technology can be used in a variety of different ways. So you can use generative AI technology as a tool assistive to enhance the human expression or you can use it as a substitute for human expression. And so control is sort of the bottom line in terms of what we’re looking at to draw that distinction."