Alana Horowitz Satlin, Huff Post; John McCain Defends Health Care Vote As ‘The Right Thing To Do’
"McCain told reporters that he thought voting no “was the right thing to do.”"
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label "the right thing to do". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "the right thing to do". Show all posts
Friday, July 28, 2017
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
A Blind Theatergoer's 'Hamilton' Lawsuit Aims Spotlight On Broadway Accessibility; NPR, March 14, 2017
Jeff Lunden, NPR;
A Blind Theatergoer's 'Hamilton' Lawsuit Aims Spotlight On Broadway Accessibility
""I think what this suit brings to light is that you have a hidden population out there that is not gaining the full access to Broadway," says attorney Scott Dinin, who is representing Lasser in the class-action suit against the show's producers and theater owner...
"Certainly once a show sets up a sustained run — and when we look at musicals that run five, 10, 15, 20 years — it really is a very small price to pay for opening up a show to a much, much wider audience," Sherman says.
That's really what Dinin, Lasser's attorney, is trying to say with this legal action. He is not seeking damages for his client — he can't, under the terms of the ADA. He is trying to make sure that theater becomes more inclusive, by spotlighting the problem, using Broadway's biggest hit.
"Audio description is so necessary," Dinin says. "It's the right thing to do. It's not that expensive. And it's just a thinking process. It's a mindset. We have to get a mindset: How do we increase inclusion? It should be top-of-mind. Equality, accommodation and respect. Because once people put that at the decision-making table, all the services will flow from that.""
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Red-state newspaper endorsements of Clinton are not as pointless as they look; Washington Post, 9/28/16
Margaret Sullivan, Washington Post; Red-state newspaper endorsements of Clinton are not as pointless as they look:
"Which brings me to the second reason for writing an endorsement editorial — even if it proves ineffectual and even if it deeply angers some readers: Publishing them is the right thing to do. Editorial boards are mostly made up of thoughtful, smart and well-informed journalists who have had a chance to study and discuss the candidates seriously. In some cases, they have had the chance to meet with them in person. They have a unique and important vantage point. What’s more, they have a bully pulpit. In a contest this important and this close, they need to use it. They would be walking away from their responsibility if they thought first about making some readers mad enough to cancel, even temporarily. “We write our editorials based on principle, and sometimes principle comes at a cost,” the Morning News’s Wilson said."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)