Showing posts with label intellectual property. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intellectual property. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Marvel Comics' Stan Lee Passes Away at 95; November 12, 2018

Kip Currier; Marvel Comics' Stan Lee Dies at 95

Marvel Comics' legend Stan Lee passed away today at the age of 95 in Los Angeles. In the 1960's, Lee collaborated with the late iconic artist Jack Kirby (and later, others as well) in co-creating many of Marvel's most famous superhero characters--the Fantastic Four, the Hulk, the Avengers, the X-Men, the Black Panther, and many more. Lee and Kirby's creations now rank among the most lucrative Intellectual Property in the "616 universe".

It's interesting to note the headlines that have been appearing today--some citing Lee as "creator", while others use "co-creator":




















Friday, April 20, 2018

33rd Annual ABA Intellectual Property Law Conference, April 18-20, 2018

33rd Annual ABA Intellectual Property Law Conference, Arlington, Virginia


[Kip Currier: The April 19th Conference sessions I attended were outstanding. Particularly thought-provoking was the "Ethical Issues in Emerging Technology" session, with panelists discussing legal, ethical, and policy implications of Wearable Technologies (e.g. FitBits), 3D Printers, and Autonomous Vehicles.

I'll be posting some highlights and photos from the sessions in the next few days.]

Friday, April 20

6:30 am – 7:45 am
LGBT Diversity Run/Walk
7:30 am – 5:00 pm
Registration • Print Café • Sponsors
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Patent: Standards Essential Patent & the Internet of Things
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Trademark/Ethics: Ethical Issues in Trademark Practice
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Copyright: International Copyright Transactions
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Patent: State of Subject Matter Eligibility Law: Its Impact on the Incentive to Innovate
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Trademark: The Dark Side of Knockoffs
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Copyright: Fair Use or Not Fair Use, that is the Question
12:00 pm – 1:30 pm
Women in IP Law Luncheon
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Specialty: Canada: More than Just Justin Trudeau
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Trademark: Current State of the Dilution Doctrine - TamImpact
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Copyright: Music Licensing 101: Understanding the Basics
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Patent/Ethics: Current Trends and Ethical Implications in IP Monetization and Litigation Financing
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Specialty: DarkNet: Enter at Your Own Risk
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Specialty: Preserving Attorney Client Privilege When Your Clients Go Global

Thursday, April 19, 2018

33rd Annual ABA Intellectual Property Law Conference, April 18-20, 2018

33rd Annual ABA Intellectual Property Law Conference, Arlington, Virginia



[Kip Currier: 1st full day of this year's American Bar Association Intellectual Property Law Conference. Lots of intriguing sessions to choose from...case in point, the 10:15 AM slot has two concurrent ones I want to attend--Trademark/Ethics: Ethical Issues in Emerging Technology and Copyright: Copyright Law and Policy Developments.

I'm also attending the Mark T. Banner luncheon today, featuring Simon Tam of the band The Slants and his legal team, who last year won a major federal trademark law case, Matal v. Tam (previously Lee v. Tam), involving so-called disparaging trademarks. The case presented potentially significant implications for free speech and economic interests. Tam and his band spoke as part of a very thought-provoking panel at Duquesne University last April, before the U.S. Supreme Court had announced its decision in June 2017. The Slants prevailed, in a unanimous decision.

talked with Tam after the April 2017 panel about the case and he insisted on having his bandmates sign the band's poster I'd purchased.

It will be interesting to hear thoughts from the various parties a year later, regarding post-Matal v. Tam implications...]


Thursday, April 19
7:00 am – 5:00 pm
Registration • Print Café • Sponsors
7:15 am – 8:30 am
Conference Connections
New Members • First-Time Attendees • Young Lawyers
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Patent: Impact of Heartland on District Court Litigation
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Trademark: From the Practitioners' Perspectives: Managing Discovery in Trademark Cases: TTAB vs. Federal Court
8:30 am – 10:00 am
Copyright/Social Media: #Ad Disclosures
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Patent: Ask the Office: Hot Topics with the USPTO Commissioner for Patents
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Trademark/Ethics: Ethical Issues in Emerging Technology
10:15 am – 11:45 am
Copyright: Copyright Law and Policy Developments
12:00 pm – 1:30 pm
Mark T. Banner Award Luncheon
Honoring Simon Tam and his legal team during a special presentation.
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Patent: Coming Together: Worlds Apart
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Trademark: Proving a Negative: Best Practices for Prosecuting and Defending Non-Use Abandonment Proceedings in the US & Abroad
1:45 pm – 3:15 pm
Copyright: The Right of Publicity
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Specialty: Growing Your Start-Up IP Practice
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Trademark/Copyright: Fictional Characters in 3D
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Specialty/Ethics: Multijurisdictional Practice and the Modern Ethical IP Attorney

Thursday, October 15, 2015

Wikileaks release of TPP deal text stokes 'freedom of expression' fears; Guardian, 10/9/15

Sam Thielman, Guardian; Wikileaks release of TPP deal text stokes 'freedom of expression' fears:
"One chapter appears to give the signatory countries (referred to as “parties”) greater power to stop embarrassing information going public. The treaty would give signatories the ability to curtail legal proceedings if the theft of information is “detrimental to a party’s economic interests, international relations, or national defense or national security” – in other words, presumably, if a trial would cause the information to spread...
“The text of the TPP’s intellectual property chapter confirms advocates warnings that this deal poses a grave threat to global freedom of expression and basic access to things like medicine and information,” said Evan Greer, campaign director of internet activist group Fight for the Future. “But the sad part is that no one should be surprised by this. It should have been obvious to anyone observing the process, where appointed government bureaucrats and monopolistic companies were given more access to the text than elected officials and journalists, that this would be the result.”"