Kenneth Dickerman, The Washington Post; Lesser-seen color photos showing the U.S. military in the 1940s
"In 1942, six months after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt created
 the OWI. While the [Farm Security Administration] FSA was created to depict the hardships that farmers
 were facing, the OWI’s mission was to foster patriotism as the nation 
mobilized for war during World War II. In that vein, it served as a 
government propaganda arm. The majority of the photos that the FSA and 
the [Office of War Information] OWI produced were black and white and are those that people are more
 familiar with. The color photos shown here are far less frequently 
seen."
The Paperback version of my Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published on Nov. 13, 2025; the Ebook on Dec. 11; and the Hardback and Cloth versions on Jan. 8, 2026. Preorders are available via Amazon and this Bloomsbury webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/
Showing posts with label public opinion and perception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public opinion and perception. Show all posts
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Lesser-seen color photos showing the U.S. military in the 1940s; The Washington Post, May 28, 2018
Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda; The Washington Post, November 8, 2018
Paul Farhi, The Washington Post; Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
"Experts said the video, in which Acosta is seen rebuffing a press aide’s attempt to take a microphone out of his hands, was altered to exaggerate the aggressiveness of Acosta’s actions.
If that is the case, the video may belong in a category rarely employed by democratic governments: visual propaganda.
 
The White House video, apparently made by a contributor to the conspiracy-peddling website Infowars
 , speeds up the movement of Acosta’s arms as the unidentified aide 
grabs at the mic during a heated conversation between the reporter and 
Trump. The video tweeted by Sanders also eliminated Acosta’s comment to 
the young woman — “Pardon me, ma’am” — as he sought to continue 
questioning the president.
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
The White House’s actions and account of them has 
drawn widespread condemnation, particularly from journalists and news 
organizations. The White House News Photographers Association, among others, said it was appalled by Sanders’s video.
“As visual journalists, we know that manipulating images is manipulating truth,” said the group’s president, Whitney Shefte,
 a Washington Post videographer. “It’s deceptive, dangerous and 
unethical. Knowingly sharing manipulated images is equally problematic, 
particularly when the person sharing them is a representative of our 
country’s highest office with vast influence over public opinion.”
Totalitarian
 governments have long recognized the value of altering photos and 
videos to manipulate public opinion and perception. Officials were 
regularly airbrushed out of state photos in the Soviet Union as 
dictators such as Joseph Stalin purged internal enemies. Wartime 
governments regularly censor images or release them selectively to 
maintain popular order and morale."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
