Kenneth Dickerman, The Washington Post; Lesser-seen color photos showing the U.S. military in the 1940s
"In 1942, six months after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt created
the OWI. While the [Farm Security Administration] FSA was created to depict the hardships that farmers
were facing, the OWI’s mission was to foster patriotism as the nation
mobilized for war during World War II. In that vein, it served as a
government propaganda arm. The majority of the photos that the FSA and
the [Office of War Information] OWI produced were black and white and are those that people are more
familiar with. The color photos shown here are far less frequently
seen."
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label public opinion and perception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public opinion and perception. Show all posts
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Lesser-seen color photos showing the U.S. military in the 1940s; The Washington Post, May 28, 2018
Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda; The Washington Post, November 8, 2018
Paul Farhi, The Washington Post; Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
"Experts said the video, in which Acosta is seen rebuffing a press aide’s attempt to take a microphone out of his hands, was altered to exaggerate the aggressiveness of Acosta’s actions.
If that is the case, the video may belong in a category rarely employed by democratic governments: visual propaganda.
The White House video, apparently made by a contributor to the conspiracy-peddling website Infowars
, speeds up the movement of Acosta’s arms as the unidentified aide
grabs at the mic during a heated conversation between the reporter and
Trump. The video tweeted by Sanders also eliminated Acosta’s comment to
the young woman — “Pardon me, ma’am” — as he sought to continue
questioning the president.
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
The White House’s actions and account of them has
drawn widespread condemnation, particularly from journalists and news
organizations. The White House News Photographers Association, among others, said it was appalled by Sanders’s video.
“As visual journalists, we know that manipulating images is manipulating truth,” said the group’s president, Whitney Shefte,
a Washington Post videographer. “It’s deceptive, dangerous and
unethical. Knowingly sharing manipulated images is equally problematic,
particularly when the person sharing them is a representative of our
country’s highest office with vast influence over public opinion.”
Totalitarian
governments have long recognized the value of altering photos and
videos to manipulate public opinion and perception. Officials were
regularly airbrushed out of state photos in the Soviet Union as
dictators such as Joseph Stalin purged internal enemies. Wartime
governments regularly censor images or release them selectively to
maintain popular order and morale."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)