David Burnett, PetaPixel; David Burnett: An Open Letter to the NPPA on Ethics
"World-renowned photojournalist David Burnett recently published an open letter to the National Press Photographers Association in response to the recent debates surrounding photojournalistic ethics and the controversial new Photo Bill of Rights that calls for, among other things, consent from subjects in public spaces. 
We first spotted his letter on the Photoshelter blog, and are republishing it here with Mr. Burnett’s permission." 
 
The Paperback version of my Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published on Nov. 13, 2025; the Ebook on Dec. 11; and the Hardback and Cloth versions on Jan. 8, 2026. Preorders are available via Amazon and this Bloomsbury webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/
Showing posts with label visual journalists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label visual journalists. Show all posts
Monday, July 13, 2020
David Burnett: An Open Letter to the NPPA on Ethics; PetaPixel, July 7, 2020
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda; The Washington Post, November 8, 2018
Paul Farhi, The Washington Post; Sarah Sanders promotes an altered video of CNN reporter, sparking allegations of visual propaganda
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
"Experts said the video, in which Acosta is seen rebuffing a press aide’s attempt to take a microphone out of his hands, was altered to exaggerate the aggressiveness of Acosta’s actions.
If that is the case, the video may belong in a category rarely employed by democratic governments: visual propaganda.
 
The White House video, apparently made by a contributor to the conspiracy-peddling website Infowars
 , speeds up the movement of Acosta’s arms as the unidentified aide 
grabs at the mic during a heated conversation between the reporter and 
Trump. The video tweeted by Sanders also eliminated Acosta’s comment to 
the young woman — “Pardon me, ma’am” — as he sought to continue 
questioning the president.
On Thursday, Sanders offered no apologies. “The question is: Did the reporter make contact or not?” she asked reporters a day after the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials for his alleged transgression. “The video is clear, he did. We stand by our statement.”
The White House’s actions and account of them has 
drawn widespread condemnation, particularly from journalists and news 
organizations. The White House News Photographers Association, among others, said it was appalled by Sanders’s video.
“As visual journalists, we know that manipulating images is manipulating truth,” said the group’s president, Whitney Shefte,
 a Washington Post videographer. “It’s deceptive, dangerous and 
unethical. Knowingly sharing manipulated images is equally problematic, 
particularly when the person sharing them is a representative of our 
country’s highest office with vast influence over public opinion.”
Totalitarian
 governments have long recognized the value of altering photos and 
videos to manipulate public opinion and perception. Officials were 
regularly airbrushed out of state photos in the Soviet Union as 
dictators such as Joseph Stalin purged internal enemies. Wartime 
governments regularly censor images or release them selectively to 
maintain popular order and morale."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
