Emily Hudson and Paul Wragg, infojustice; Proposals for Copyright Law and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic
"Abstract: This article asks whether the catastrophic
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic justifies new limitations or
interventions in copyright law so that UK educational institutions can
continue to serve the needs of their students. It describes the existing
copyright landscape and suggests ways in which institutions can rely on
exceptions in the CDPA, including fair dealing and the exemption for
lending by educational establishments. It then considers the viability
of other solutions. It argues that issues caused by the pandemic would
not enliven a public interest defence to copyright infringement (to the
extent this still exists in UK law) but may be relevant to remedies. It
also argues that compulsory licensing, while permissible under
international copyright law, would not be a desirable intervention, but
that legislative expansion to the existing exceptions, in order to
encourage voluntary collective licensing, has a number of attractions.
It concludes by observing that the pandemic highlights issues with the
prevailing model for academic publishing, and asks whether COVID may
encourage universities to embrace in-house and open access publishing
more swiftly and for an even greater body of material."
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Open Access publishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Open Access publishing. Show all posts
Friday, June 12, 2020
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
Feds Target 'Predatory' Publishers; Inside Higher Ed, 8/29/16
Carl Straumsheim, Inside Higher Ed; Feds Target 'Predatory' Publishers:
"The Federal Trade Commission on Friday filed a complaint against the academic journal publisher OMICS Group and two of its subsidiaries, saying the publisher deceives scholars and misrepresents the editorial rigor of its journals. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, marks the first time the FTC has gone after what are often known as “predatory” publishers. Such publishers exploit open-access publishing as a way to charge steep fees to researchers who believe their work will be printed in legitimate journals, when in fact the journals may publish anyone who pays and lack even a basic peer-review process."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)