JD Supra; Judge Facciola Says Carpenter Decision May Signal the End of the Third Party Doctrine
"The old view of the third-party doctrine must yield to new concerns
about recent technology or what CJ Roberts called “the critical issue”
of “basic Fourth Amendment concerns about arbitrary government power”
that are “wrought by digital technology.”
Overall, the Roberts Court seems to understand electronic privacy’s
importance, especially when Carpenter is coupled with the previous
decisions in US v Jones (2011), which required a warrant before police placed a GPS tracker on a vehicle and Riley v California (2014) which forbade warrantless searches of a cell phone during an arrest."
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Judge John Facciola. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judge John Facciola. Show all posts
Friday, July 6, 2018
Judge Facciola Says Carpenter Decision May Signal the End of the Third Party Doctrine; JD Supra, July 5, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)