Jim Waterson, The Guardian; Threat to journalists at highest level in 10 years, report says
"Journalism is more dangerous – and more under threat – than at any
point in the last decade, according to a report, which found that 78
journalists were killed last year while doing their job.
The rise of authoritarian governments and the threat of internet
censorship has redoubled pressures on reporters globally, according to
the human rights organisation Article 19, which found that a further 326
journalists were imprisoned for their work during 2017, a substantial increase on the previous year.
More than half of those behind bars were held in Turkey, China, and Egypt, often on charges of opposing the state.
“The price of protecting the right to freedom of expression and
information has become extremely high: death, detention, and fear loom
large for communicators and activists across the globe, and the space
for meaningful discussion and communication is under siege,” said Thomas
Hughes, the executive director of Article 19. “More than ever we need
informed citizens, strong institutions, and the rule of law.”"
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Internet censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet censorship. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
Threat to journalists at highest level in 10 years, report says ; The Guardian, December 4, 2018
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Jamal Khashoggi: What the Arab world needs most is free expression; The Washington Post, October 17, 2018
Jamal Khashoggi, The Washington Post;
I was recently online looking at the 2018 “Freedom in the World” report published by Freedom House and came to a grave realization. There is only one country in the Arab world that has been classified as “free.” That nation is Tunisia. Jordan, Morocco and Kuwait come second, with a classification of “partly free.” The rest of the countries in the Arab world are classified as “not free.”
As a result, Arabs living in these countries are either uninformed or misinformed. They are unable to adequately address, much less publicly discuss, matters that affect the region and their day-to-day lives. A state-run narrative dominates the public psyche, and while many do not believe it, a large majority of the population falls victim to this false narrative. Sadly, this situation is unlikely to change."
Jamal Khashoggi: What the Arab world needs most is free expression
"A note from Karen Attiah, Global Opinions editor
I
received this column from Jamal Khashoggi’s translator and assistant
the day after Jamal was reported missing in Istanbul. The Post held off
publishing it because we hoped Jamal would come back to us so that he
and I could edit it together. Now I have to accept: That is not going to
happen. This is the last piece of his I will edit for The Post. This
column perfectly captures his commitment and passion for freedom in the
Arab world. A freedom he apparently gave his life for. I will be forever
grateful he chose The Post as his final journalistic home one year ago
and gave us the chance to work together.
I was recently online looking at the 2018 “Freedom in the World” report published by Freedom House and came to a grave realization. There is only one country in the Arab world that has been classified as “free.” That nation is Tunisia. Jordan, Morocco and Kuwait come second, with a classification of “partly free.” The rest of the countries in the Arab world are classified as “not free.”
As a result, Arabs living in these countries are either uninformed or misinformed. They are unable to adequately address, much less publicly discuss, matters that affect the region and their day-to-day lives. A state-run narrative dominates the public psyche, and while many do not believe it, a large majority of the population falls victim to this false narrative. Sadly, this situation is unlikely to change."
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
The New Censorship: How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?; U.S. News, 6/22/16
Robert Epstein, U.S. News; The New Censorship: How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites? :
"Google's mysterious and self-serving practice of blacklisting is one of many reasons Google should be regulated, just as phone companies and credit bureaus are. The E.U.'s recent antitrust actions against Google, the recently leaked FTC staff report about Google's biased search rankings, President Obama's call for regulating internet service providers – all have merit, but they overlook another danger. No one company, which is accountable to its shareholders but not to the general public, should have the power to instantly put another company out of business or block access to any website in the world. How frequently Google acts irresponsibly is beside the point; it has the ability to do so, which means that in a matter of seconds any of Google's 37,000 employees with the right passwords or skills could laser a business or political candidate into oblivion or even freeze much of the world's economy. Some degree of censorship and blacklisting is probably necessary; I am not disputing that. But the suppression of information on the internet needs to be managed by, or at least subject to the regulations of, responsible public officials, with every aspect of their operations transparent to all."
Monday, December 23, 2013
China To Media: Don't Report 'Wrong Points Of View'; Reuters via Huffington Post, 12/23/13
Reuters via Huffington Post; China To Media: Don't Report 'Wrong Points Of View' :
"...[S]ince Xi Jinping became party chief and then national president, he has overseen a media crackdown to bring newspapers in particular back in line.
Under new guidelines to enforce "core socialist values", the media must "steadfastly uphold the correct guidance of public opinion".
"Strengthen the management of the media, do not provide channels for the propagation of the wrong points of view," read the guidelines, which were published by the official Xinhua news agency...
Xi has also taken a tough line on internet censorship, and the new guidelines implied that would continue."
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Wary of Egypt Unrest, China Censors Web; New York Times, 2/1/11
Edward Wong and David Barboza, New York Times; Wary of Egypt Unrest, China Censors Web:
"Sina.com and Netease.com — two of the nation’s biggest online portals — blocked keyword searches of the word “Egypt,” though the mass protests were being discussed on some Internet chat rooms on Monday. Searching for “Egypt” has also been blocked on Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter.
Censoring the Internet is not the only approach. The Chinese government has also tried to get out ahead of the discussion, framing the Egyptian protests in a few editorials and articles in state-controlled news publications as a chaotic affair that embodies the pitfalls of trying to plant democracy in countries that are not quite ready for it — a line China’s leaders have long held."
"Sina.com and Netease.com — two of the nation’s biggest online portals — blocked keyword searches of the word “Egypt,” though the mass protests were being discussed on some Internet chat rooms on Monday. Searching for “Egypt” has also been blocked on Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter.
Censoring the Internet is not the only approach. The Chinese government has also tried to get out ahead of the discussion, framing the Egyptian protests in a few editorials and articles in state-controlled news publications as a chaotic affair that embodies the pitfalls of trying to plant democracy in countries that are not quite ready for it — a line China’s leaders have long held."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)