"The 
case underscores with greater vigor than ever the need for restrictions 
on facial recognition technology. But putting limits on what the police 
or private businesses can do with a tool such as Clearview’s won’t stop 
bad actors from breaking them. There also need to be limits on whether a
 tool such as Clearview’s can exist in this country in the first place.
Top
 platforms’ policies generally prohibit the sort of data-scraping 
Clearview has engaged in, but it’s difficult for a company to protect information that’s on the open Web. Courts have also ruled against platforms
 when they have tried to go after scrapers under existing copyright or 
computer fraud law — and understandably, as too-onerous restrictions 
could hurt journalists and public-interest groups.
Privacy legislation is a more promising area for action, to prevent third parties 
including
 Clearview from assembling databases such as these in the first 
place, whether they’re filled with faces or location records or credit 
scores. That will take exactly the robust federal framework Congress has
 so far failed to provide, and a government that’s ready to enforce it." 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.