Jason Blevins, The Colorado Sun; Backcountry.com breaks its silence amid trademark lawsuit controversy to apologize and say “we made a mistake”
"“To be fair, this is not about Marquette Backcountry Skis. It’s about
the small nonprofits, it’s about the guides and the small businesses
they targeted. This has all been about the lawsuits filed against the
people in front of me and the ones coming for the people behind me,”
[David] Ollila said. “What we’ve witnessed here is that it takes 25 years to
build a business and a reputation and it can be lost very quickly with
these poor decisions. I wonder how the market will react to this. I
wonder if they can be forgiven.”...
“This boycott isn’t about a word,” [Jon Miller] said. “What is happening is that a
corporation has a stranglehold over our culture in a battle over a word
they literally don’t even own.”"
Ethically-tangled aspects of 21st century societies and cultures. In the vein of Charles Darwin’s 1859 “entangled bank” metaphor—a complex and evolving digital ecosystem of difference and dependence, where humans, technologies, ethics, law, policy, data, and information converge and diverge. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label federal trademark law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal trademark law. Show all posts
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Sunday, January 6, 2019
Supreme Court to decide if trademark protection can be denied to ‘scandalous’ brands; The Washington Post, January 4, 2019
Robert Barnes, The Washington Post; Supreme Court to decide if trademark protection can be denied to ‘scandalous’ brands
The case,Iancu v. Brunetti , will probably be heard at the Supreme Court in April."
"The Supreme Court agreed Friday to review a new
front in the battle over free speech and will decide whether trademark
protection can be refused to brands the federal government finds vulgar
or lewd.
The case involves a decision of the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to deny trademark registration to a
clothing line called FUCT.
The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down the century-old ban on
protecting “scandalous” and “immoral” trademarks as a First Amendment
violation, and the Department of Justice wants the Supreme Court to
reverse the decision...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)