"This editorial has been updated.
And
 how reassuring to read the Archives’ forthright — and, for Washington, 
extraordinary — statement on Saturday: “We made a mistake. . . . We have
 removed the current display. . . . We apologize.”
The Post’s Joe Heim reported
 Friday that the Archives made numerous alterations to a photograph 
included in an exhibit dedicated to the 100th anniversary of women’s 
suffrage. The photo shows the massively attended Women’s March held in 
January 2017 to protest President Trump’s inauguration. But Archives 
curators altered signs being carried by the women to delete references 
to Mr. Trump — and thereby they seriously distorted the meaning of the 
event. “A placard that proclaims ‘God Hates Trump’ has ‘Trump’ blotted 
out so that it reads ‘God Hates,’ ” The Post reported. But “God Hates” 
was not the message of the protester carrying that sign. Another sign 
that reads “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women” has the word ‘Trump” 
blurred out.
In
 their initial weak defense, Archives officials noted that they had not 
altered articles they preserve for safekeeping, only a photograph for a 
temporary exhibit. We did not find that reassuring, as we said in the 
first published version of this editorial. Photo alteration long has 
been the preserve of authoritarian governments, most famously Soviet 
dictator Josef Stalin, who erased comrades from historical photographs one by one as he had them executed.
The
 United States government should never play the same game, even on a 
small scale. The goal in this case may have been not to irritate the 
snowflake in chief residing up Pennsylvania Avenue from the Archives. 
After all, the Women’s March harks back to one of the foundational lies 
of the Trump presidency, when he falsely insisted, and insisted that his
 officials likewise falsely insist, that his inauguration crowd was the 
largest of all time. Mr. Trump’s refusal to back down then set the 
pattern for his presidency: Lies are acceptable, and evidence can be 
ignored.
Rather
 than remind anyone of such unpleasantness, the Archives chose to 
falsify history and pretend that the Women’s March had nothing to do 
with Mr. Trump. That, as we wrote, offered a terrible lesson to young 
visitors to the exhibit about how democracies deal with news, with 
history — with truth.
Now
 the Archives has presented a far more uplifting lesson. Admitting and 
correcting a mistake are usually a lot harder for any of us than erring 
in the first place. But in their statement, officials did not flinch. 
The Archives will replace the altered image “as soon as possible with 
one that uses the unaltered image. We apologize, and will immediately 
start a thorough review of our exhibit policies and procedures so that 
this does not happen again.”
Good for them."
