Rick Anderson, The Scholarly Kitchen; Do You Have Concerns about Plan S? Then You Must be an Irresponsible, Privileged, Conspiratorial Hypocrite
"Ultimately, though, what is most concerning about Plan S is not the
behavior of those hell-bent on defending it by any means necessary.
That’s just par for the course.
More important is the way in which researchers themselves — the people
whose work and whose freedom to choose will be directly affected by its
implementation — seem to have been excluded from the process of
formulating it. This shouldn’t be surprising, I guess, given the disdain
in which authors and researchers are apparently held by Plan S’s
creators. After all, as Science Europe’s Robert-Jan Smits puts it: “Why do we need Plan S? Because researchers are irresponsible.”
There you have it. The freedom to choose how to publish isn’t for
everyone; it’s only for those who are “responsible” — which is to say,
those who agree with Plan S."
Ethically-tangled aspects of 21st century societies and cultures. In the vein of Charles Darwin’s 1859 “entangled bank” metaphor—a complex and evolving digital ecosystem of difference and dependence, where humans, technologies, ethics, law, policy, data, and information converge and diverge. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Plan S viewpoints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Plan S viewpoints. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)