Last July, another legal effort to reinterpret the rights of other primates failed to persuade a judge. The Nonhuman Rights Project argued in a State Supreme Court in Manhattan that two apes being held by a university for research were “legal persons,” highly intelligent and self-aware, and should be removed to a sanctuary. The judge took the case seriously, but ultimately decided that under the law, Hercules and Leo were property, not people. Despite PETA’s setback this week, the group cast its unorthodox legal battle as a crucial step toward enlarging the rights of animals. “We will continue to fight for Naruto and his fellow macaques,” Jeff Kerr, an attorney for PETA, said in a statement, adding “As my legal mentor used to say, ‘In social-cause cases, historically, you lose, you lose, you lose, and then you win.’”"
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label Judge William Orrick rules no right for animals to have right of copyright under US law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judge William Orrick rules no right for animals to have right of copyright under US law. Show all posts
Saturday, January 9, 2016
Monkey Has No Rights to Its Selfie, Federal Judge Says; New York Times, 1/8/16
Mike McPhate, New York Times; Monkey Has No Rights to Its Selfie, Federal Judge Says:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)