Karen Sloan, Reuters; A lawyer used ChatGPT to cite bogus cases. What are the ethics?
"A New York lawyer is facing potential sanctions over an error-riddled brief he drafted with help from ChatGPT.
It's a scenario legal ethics experts have warned about since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in November, marking a new era for AI that can produce human-like responses based on vast amounts of data.
Steven Schwartz of Levidow, Levidow & Oberman faces a June 8 sanctions hearing before U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel after he admitted to using ChatGPT for a brief in his client's personal injury case against Avianca Airlines. The brief cited six non-existent court decisions."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.