Greg Epstein, TechCrunch; Expert Panel: What even IS 'tech ethics'?
"It’s been a pleasure,
this past month, to launch a weekly series investigating issues in tech
ethics, here at TechCrunch. As discussions around my first few pieces
have taken off, I’ve noticed one question recurring in a number of
different ways: what even IS “tech ethics”? I believe there’s lots of
room for debate about what this growing field entails, and I hope that
remains the case because we’re going to need multiple ethical
perspectives on technologies that are changing billions of lives. That
said, we need to at least attempt to define what we’re talking about,
in order to have clearer public conversations about the ethics of
technology."
Showing posts with label experts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label experts. Show all posts
Monday, April 8, 2019
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
The experts were right: Trump isn’t fit to be president; Washington Post, May 16, 2017
Anne Applebaum, Washington Post;
The experts were right: Trump isn’t fit to be president
"We live in an age that denigrates knowledge, dislikes expertise and demonizes experts. But now we have proof that experts are sometimes right...
At the time, Trump dismissed this letter as “nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold onto their power.” But the “elites” were right. The experts were right. Next time maybe more people will heed them."
The experts were right: Trump isn’t fit to be president
"We live in an age that denigrates knowledge, dislikes expertise and demonizes experts. But now we have proof that experts are sometimes right...
At the time, Trump dismissed this letter as “nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold onto their power.” But the “elites” were right. The experts were right. Next time maybe more people will heed them."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)