Lawrence M. Hinman, San Diego Union-Tribune; Driverless cars raise so many ethical questions. Here are just a few of them.
"Even more troubling will be the algorithms themselves, even if the engineering works flawlessly. How are we going to program autonomous vehicles when they are faced with a choice among competing evils? Should they be programmed to harm or kill the smallest number of people, swerving to avoid hitting two people but unavoidably hitting one? (This is the famous “trolley problem” that has vexed philosophers and moral psychologists for over half a century.)
Should your car be programmed to avoid crashing into a group of schoolchildren, even if that means driving you off the side of a cliff? Most of us would opt for maximizing the number of lives saved, except when one of those lives belongs to us or our loved ones.
These are questions that take us to the heart of the moral life in a technological society. They are already part of a lively and nuanced discussion among philosophers, engineers, policy makers and technologists. It is a conversation to which the larger public should be invited.
The ethics of dealing with autonomous systems will be a central issue of the coming decades."
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label the public. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the public. Show all posts
Saturday, March 24, 2018
Driverless cars raise so many ethical questions. Here are just a few of them.; San Diego Union-Tribune, March 23, 2018
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
Chaffetz to get meeting he demanded with ethics official who criticized Trump; Politico, 1/18/17
Darren Samuelsohn, Politico;
"“Allowing the public to attend our meeting — or, at the very least, to view it through live broadcast or the attendance of the news media — would ensure transparency and educate the public about how OGE guards the executive branch against conflicts of interest,” he added, though noting he would agree to a private meeting if Chaffetz again refused to speak in front of an audience.
But on Thursday, Chaffetz office said he and Shaub would meet privately on Monday, Jan. 23.
The request for a public meeting is the latest turn in an escalating feud pitting Shaub against Chaffetz and the Trump administration.
It’s also part of a broader struggle over Shaub’s new order of operation under the Office of Government Ethics. The agency has typically operated in relative obscurity under past directors, but, dealing with a president elect who heads a vast business empire, the director has made a controversial break with precedent by adopting an increasingly public profile."
Chaffetz to get meeting he demanded with ethics official who criticized Trump
"“Allowing the public to attend our meeting — or, at the very least, to view it through live broadcast or the attendance of the news media — would ensure transparency and educate the public about how OGE guards the executive branch against conflicts of interest,” he added, though noting he would agree to a private meeting if Chaffetz again refused to speak in front of an audience.
But on Thursday, Chaffetz office said he and Shaub would meet privately on Monday, Jan. 23.
The request for a public meeting is the latest turn in an escalating feud pitting Shaub against Chaffetz and the Trump administration.
It’s also part of a broader struggle over Shaub’s new order of operation under the Office of Government Ethics. The agency has typically operated in relative obscurity under past directors, but, dealing with a president elect who heads a vast business empire, the director has made a controversial break with precedent by adopting an increasingly public profile."
Friday, August 12, 2016
Think Tanks and the Influence of Corporate Dollars; New York Times, 8/10/16
Room for Debate, New York Times; Think Tanks and the Influence of Corporate Dollars:
"Think tanks inform both government policy and media analysis with their research, because as nonprofit institutions, they are seen as independent. But some institutions vigorously push their donors’ agendas, acting like lobbyists. Some scholars even use their positions at think tanks to promote work they are separately paid to do for corporations. What can be done to protect against corporate influence over research institutions?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)