Lindsay McKenzie, Inside Higher Ed; Open Access at the Movies
"[Jason] Schmitt's film raises some important questions -- how is it possible
that big for-profit publishers, such as Elsevier, have fatter profit
margins than some of the biggest corporations in the world? Why can't
everyone read all publicly funded research for free?
Discussion of these questions in the film is undoubtedly one-sided.
Of around 70 people featured in the film, just a handful work for
for-profit publishers like Springer-Nature or the American Association
for the Advancement of Science -- and they don't get much screen time.
There is also no representative from Elsevier, despite the publisher
being the focus of much criticism in the film. This was not for lack of
trying, said Schmitt. “I offered Elsevier a five-minute section of the
film that they could have full creative control over,” he said. “They
turned me down.”
Schmitt said he made Paywall not for academics and scholars
but for the general public. He wants people to understand how scholarly
publishing works, and why they should care that they can’t access
research paid for with their tax dollars."
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label scholarly publishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scholarly publishing. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 11, 2018
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Librarians Find Themselves Caught Between Journal Pirates and Publishers; Chronicle of Higher Education, 2/18/16
Corinne Ruff, Chronicle of Higher Education; Librarians Find Themselves Caught Between Journal Pirates and Publishers:
"The rise, fall, and resurfacing of a popular piracy website for scholarly-journal articles, Sci-Hub, has highlighted tensions between academic librarians and scholarly publishers. Academics are increasingly turning to websites like Sci-Hub to view subscriber-only articles that they cannot obtain at their college or that they need more quickly than interlibrary loan can provide. That trend puts librarians in an awkward position. While many are proponents of open access and understand the challenges scholars face in gaining access to information, they are also bound by their contracts with publishers, which obligate them to crack down on pirates. And while few, if any, librarians openly endorse piracy, many believe that the scholarly-publishing system is broken."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)