Olivia Goldhill, Quartz; The push to create AI-friendly ethics codes is stripping all nuance from morality
"A paper led by Veljko Dubljević, neuroethics researcher at North Carolina State University, published yesterday (Oct. 2) in PLOS ONE, claims to establish not just the answer to one ethical question, but the entire groundwork for how moral judgements are made.
According to the paper’s “Agent Deed Consequence model,” three things are taken into account when making a moral decision: the person doing the action, the moral action itself, and the consequences of that action. To test this theory, the researchers created moral scenarios that varied details about the agent, the action, and the consequences."
Showing posts with label how moral judgments are made. Show all posts
Showing posts with label how moral judgments are made. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)