"Doctors and scientists have an ethical duty to explain to patients the implications of online data sharing, and to explain them well. In our recent study, we interviewed participants in the Personal Genome Project and found that when researchers are completely open about the risks and benefits of making their genetic and health data public, participants were often willing to consent because they wanted to help advance science. It is up to scientists, then, to make good on their promise to accelerate discovery in the treatment and prevention of diseases, by ensuring that patient data is properly stored and managed so that other researchers can use it. At the same time, more needs to be done to minimize the risks, like privacy violations, through better data security and legal protections for study participants. JULIA BRODY"
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label call for doctors and scientists to uphold ethical duty to explain to patients implications of online data sharing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label call for doctors and scientists to uphold ethical duty to explain to patients implications of online data sharing. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
Sharing Health Data Online; New York Times, 2/16/16
[Letter to the Editor] Julia Brody, New York Times; Sharing Health Data Online:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)