"In 1964, damaging and completely erroneous psychological assessments were made about then-presidential candidate, Barry Goldwater. The American Psychiatric Association instituted a new guideline: psychiatrists should not offer opinions about people they’ve not personally examined. But in recent weeks, some psychiatrists, psychologists and other mental health professionals have broken this rule. They are speaking out about what they see as Donald Trump’s unfitness to be president. The pitfalls of diagnosing from afar and when personality disorders can be strengths. Guests Amy Ellis Nutt science writer, The Washington Post Dr. Paul Appelbaum professor of psychiatry, medicine, and law, Columbia University William Doherty psychologist and director, Citizen Professional Center, University of Minnesota Ron Elving senior Washington editor, NPR News"
Issues and developments related to ethics, information, and technologies, examined in the ethics and intellectual property graduate courses I teach at the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing and Information. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published in Summer 2025. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label armchair psychological assessments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label armchair psychological assessments. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 17, 2016
Debate Over Armchair Psychological Assessments Of Donald Trump; Diane Rehm Show, 8/17/16
[Podcast] Diane Rehm Show; Debate Over Armchair Psychological Assessments Of Donald Trump:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)