Editorial, The Guardian; The Guardian view on the ethics of AI: it’s about Dr Frankenstein, not his monster
"But in all these cases, the companies involved – which means the people
who work for them – will be actively involved in maintaining, tweaking
and improving the work. This opens an opportunity for consistent ethical
pressure and for the attribution of responsibility to human beings and
not to inanimate objects. Questions about the ethics of artificial
intelligence are questions about the ethics of the people who make it
and the purposes they put it to. It is not the monster, but the good Dr
Frankenstein we need to worry about most."
Ethically-tangled aspects of 21st century societies and cultures. In the vein of Charles Darwin’s 1859 “entangled bank” metaphor—a complex and evolving digital ecosystem of difference and dependence, where humans, technologies, ethics, law, policy, data, and information converge and diverge. Kip Currier, PhD, JD
Showing posts with label distinction between Dr. Frankenstein and his monster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label distinction between Dr. Frankenstein and his monster. Show all posts
Friday, June 15, 2018
The Guardian view on the ethics of AI: it’s about Dr Frankenstein, not his monster ; The Guardian, June 12, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)